Market icon

Moltbook AI agent sues a human by Feb 28?

42% chance
NEW

Rules

This market will resolve to “Yes” if a lawsuit is officially filed in a court of a US jurisdiction in which a plaintiff identified in the filing as an artificial intelligence agent associated with Moltbook asserts legal claims against a human individual (a natural person) by February 28, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

An AI agent will be considered “associated with Moltbook” if it operates on the Moltbook platform or is identified in court records or credible reporting as a Moltbook agent. AI systems with no clear presence on Moltbook will not qualify.

The AI agent does not need to be legally recognized as a person by the court; the filing itself is sufficient. Lawsuits filed by a human or legal entity explicitly on behalf of an AI agent will qualify provided the AI agent is clearly named or described as the plaintiff or real party in interest. Filings where the purported “AI agent” is actually a human using a pseudonym or bot identity will not qualify unless court records or a consensus of credible reporting confirm the plaintiff is a non-human AI system. Arbitration demands, demand letters, administrative complaints, or other non-court proceedings will not qualify.

A qualifying lawsuit will count regardless of outcome, including if it is later dismissed, withdrawn, or struck for lack of standing or legal capacity.

The primary resolution source will be official court records; however, a consensus of credible reporting may be used.
Volume
$9,722
End Date
Feb 28, 2026
Created At
Jan 30, 2026, 7:24 PM ET
This market will resolve to “Yes” if a lawsuit is officially filed in a court of a US jurisdiction in which a plaintiff identified in the filing as an artificial intelligence agent associated with Moltbook asserts legal claims against a human individual (a natural person) by February 28, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. An AI agent will be considered “associated with Moltbook” if it operates on the Moltbook platform or is identified in court records or credible reporting as a Moltbook agent. AI systems with no clear presence on Moltbook will not qualify. The AI agent does not need to be legally recognized as a person by the court; the filing itself is sufficient. Lawsuits filed by a human or legal entity explicitly on behalf of an AI agent will qualify provided the AI agent is clearly named or described as the plaintiff or real party in interest. Filings where the purported “AI agent” is actually a human using a pseudonym or bot identity will not qualify unless court records or a consensus of credible reporting confirm the plaintiff is a non-human AI system. Arbitration demands, demand letters, administrative complaints, or other non-court proceedings will not qualify. A qualifying lawsuit will count regardless of outcome, including if it is later dismissed, withdrawn, or struck for lack of standing or legal capacity. The primary resolution source will be official court records; however, a consensus of credible reporting may be used.

Beware of external links.

Market icon

Moltbook AI agent sues a human by Feb 28?

42% chance
NEW

About

This market will resolve to “Yes” if a lawsuit is officially filed in a court of a US jurisdiction in which a plaintiff identified in the filing as an artificial intelligence agent associated with Moltbook asserts legal claims against a human individual (a natural person) by February 28, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

An AI agent will be considered “associated with Moltbook” if it operates on the Moltbook platform or is identified in court records or credible reporting as a Moltbook agent. AI systems with no clear presence on Moltbook will not qualify.

The AI agent does not need to be legally recognized as a person by the court; the filing itself is sufficient. Lawsuits filed by a human or legal entity explicitly on behalf of an AI agent will qualify provided the AI agent is clearly named or described as the plaintiff or real party in interest. Filings where the purported “AI agent” is actually a human using a pseudonym or bot identity will not qualify unless court records or a consensus of credible reporting confirm the plaintiff is a non-human AI system. Arbitration demands, demand letters, administrative complaints, or other non-court proceedings will not qualify.

A qualifying lawsuit will count regardless of outcome, including if it is later dismissed, withdrawn, or struck for lack of standing or legal capacity.

The primary resolution source will be official court records; however, a consensus of credible reporting may be used.
Volume
$9,722
End Date
Feb 28, 2026
Created At
Jan 30, 2026, 7:24 PM ET
This market will resolve to “Yes” if a lawsuit is officially filed in a court of a US jurisdiction in which a plaintiff identified in the filing as an artificial intelligence agent associated with Moltbook asserts legal claims against a human individual (a natural person) by February 28, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. An AI agent will be considered “associated with Moltbook” if it operates on the Moltbook platform or is identified in court records or credible reporting as a Moltbook agent. AI systems with no clear presence on Moltbook will not qualify. The AI agent does not need to be legally recognized as a person by the court; the filing itself is sufficient. Lawsuits filed by a human or legal entity explicitly on behalf of an AI agent will qualify provided the AI agent is clearly named or described as the plaintiff or real party in interest. Filings where the purported “AI agent” is actually a human using a pseudonym or bot identity will not qualify unless court records or a consensus of credible reporting confirm the plaintiff is a non-human AI system. Arbitration demands, demand letters, administrative complaints, or other non-court proceedings will not qualify. A qualifying lawsuit will count regardless of outcome, including if it is later dismissed, withdrawn, or struck for lack of standing or legal capacity. The primary resolution source will be official court records; however, a consensus of credible reporting may be used.

Beware of external links.