A federal judge's preliminary injunction on March 31 halted construction of President Trump's proposed 90,000-square-foot White House East Wing ballroom, ruling that the project requires congressional authorization as the president is a steward, not owner, of federal property. This recent court order, stemming from a nonprofit group's lawsuit, rejected administration arguments and emphasized statutory limits on executive actions for White House alterations, driving trader consensus to an 82% implied probability of "No" unblocking by April 30. Public opposition earlier delayed National Capital Planning Commission review, while appeals or legislative approval face tight timelines amid partisan divides, with no immediate resolution signals. Historical precedent shows such injunctions often prolong disputes through higher courts.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket · ActualizadoTrump ballroom project unblocked by April 30?
Trump ballroom project unblocked by April 30?
NUEVO
NUEVO
30 abr 2026
NUEVO
NUEVO
30 abr 2026
A federal judge recently issued a preliminary injunction to halt construction of Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project (see: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/31/politics/judge-rules-that-white-house-ballroom-contstuction-stop).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, at any point between market creation and April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, there are no federal court orders in effect that block construction of the White House ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, a “block” refers to any federal court order, including a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or substantially similar order, that prohibits or materially restricts construction of the ballroom project.
A court order will be considered “in effect” upon issuance unless it has been formally lifted, vacated, expired, or otherwise invalidated such that it is no longer legally enforceable (e.g., through actions of a higher court). Orders for which enforcement is delayed pending further review (e.g. through a temporary administrative stay, or stay pending appeal) will still be considered “in effect”.
If the White House ballroom project receives congressional approval such that all court orders blocking construction are invalidated or rendered unenforceable, this market will resolve to “Yes”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from relevant federal courts; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.A federal judge's preliminary injunction on March 31 halted construction of President Trump's proposed 90,000-square-foot White House East Wing ballroom, ruling that the project requires congressional authorization as the president is a steward, not owner, of federal property. This recent court order, stemming from a nonprofit group's lawsuit, rejected administration arguments and emphasized statutory limits on executive actions for White House alterations, driving trader consensus to an 82% implied probability of "No" unblocking by April 30. Public opposition earlier delayed National Capital Planning Commission review, while appeals or legislative approval face tight timelines amid partisan divides, with no immediate resolution signals. Historical precedent shows such injunctions often prolong disputes through higher courts.
A federal judge recently issued a preliminary injunction to halt construction of Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project (see: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/31/politics/judge-rules-that-white-house-ballroom-contstuction-stop).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, at any point between market creation and April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, there are no federal court orders in effect that block construction of the White House ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, a “block” refers to any federal court order, including a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or substantially similar order, that prohibits or materially restricts construction of the ballroom project.
A court order will be considered “in effect” upon issuance unless it has been formally lifted, vacated, expired, or otherwise invalidated such that it is no longer legally enforceable (e.g., through actions of a higher court). Orders for which enforcement is delayed pending further review (e.g. through a temporary administrative stay, or stay pending appeal) will still be considered “in effect”.
If the White House ballroom project receives congressional approval such that all court orders blocking construction are invalidated or rendered unenforceable, this market will resolve to “Yes”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from relevant federal courts; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, at any point between market creation and April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, there are no federal court orders in effect that block construction of the White House ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, a “block” refers to any federal court order, including a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or substantially similar order, that prohibits or materially restricts construction of the ballroom project.
A court order will be considered “in effect” upon issuance unless it has been formally lifted, vacated, expired, or otherwise invalidated such that it is no longer legally enforceable (e.g., through actions of a higher court). Orders for which enforcement is delayed pending further review (e.g. through a temporary administrative stay, or stay pending appeal) will still be considered “in effect”.
If the White House ballroom project receives congressional approval such that all court orders blocking construction are invalidated or rendered unenforceable, this market will resolve to “Yes”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from relevant federal courts; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado abierto: Apr 1, 2026, 4:44 PM ET
Volumen
$699Fecha de finalización
30 abr 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 1, 2026, 4:44 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...A federal judge recently issued a preliminary injunction to halt construction of Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project (see: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/31/politics/judge-rules-that-white-house-ballroom-contstuction-stop).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, at any point between market creation and April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, there are no federal court orders in effect that block construction of the White House ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, a “block” refers to any federal court order, including a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or substantially similar order, that prohibits or materially restricts construction of the ballroom project.
A court order will be considered “in effect” upon issuance unless it has been formally lifted, vacated, expired, or otherwise invalidated such that it is no longer legally enforceable (e.g., through actions of a higher court). Orders for which enforcement is delayed pending further review (e.g. through a temporary administrative stay, or stay pending appeal) will still be considered “in effect”.
If the White House ballroom project receives congressional approval such that all court orders blocking construction are invalidated or rendered unenforceable, this market will resolve to “Yes”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from relevant federal courts; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.A federal judge's preliminary injunction on March 31 halted construction of President Trump's proposed 90,000-square-foot White House East Wing ballroom, ruling that the project requires congressional authorization as the president is a steward, not owner, of federal property. This recent court order, stemming from a nonprofit group's lawsuit, rejected administration arguments and emphasized statutory limits on executive actions for White House alterations, driving trader consensus to an 82% implied probability of "No" unblocking by April 30. Public opposition earlier delayed National Capital Planning Commission review, while appeals or legislative approval face tight timelines amid partisan divides, with no immediate resolution signals. Historical precedent shows such injunctions often prolong disputes through higher courts.
A federal judge recently issued a preliminary injunction to halt construction of Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project (see: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/31/politics/judge-rules-that-white-house-ballroom-contstuction-stop).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, at any point between market creation and April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, there are no federal court orders in effect that block construction of the White House ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, a “block” refers to any federal court order, including a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or substantially similar order, that prohibits or materially restricts construction of the ballroom project.
A court order will be considered “in effect” upon issuance unless it has been formally lifted, vacated, expired, or otherwise invalidated such that it is no longer legally enforceable (e.g., through actions of a higher court). Orders for which enforcement is delayed pending further review (e.g. through a temporary administrative stay, or stay pending appeal) will still be considered “in effect”.
If the White House ballroom project receives congressional approval such that all court orders blocking construction are invalidated or rendered unenforceable, this market will resolve to “Yes”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from relevant federal courts; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, at any point between market creation and April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, there are no federal court orders in effect that block construction of the White House ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
For the purposes of this market, a “block” refers to any federal court order, including a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or substantially similar order, that prohibits or materially restricts construction of the ballroom project.
A court order will be considered “in effect” upon issuance unless it has been formally lifted, vacated, expired, or otherwise invalidated such that it is no longer legally enforceable (e.g., through actions of a higher court). Orders for which enforcement is delayed pending further review (e.g. through a temporary administrative stay, or stay pending appeal) will still be considered “in effect”.
If the White House ballroom project receives congressional approval such that all court orders blocking construction are invalidated or rendered unenforceable, this market will resolve to “Yes”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from relevant federal courts; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volumen
$699Fecha de finalización
30 abr 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 1, 2026, 4:44 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...A federal judge's preliminary injunction on March 31 halted construction of President Trump's proposed 90,000-square-foot White House East Wing ballroom, ruling that the project requires congressional authorization as the president is a steward, not owner, of federal property. This recent court order, stemming from a nonprofit group's lawsuit, rejected administration arguments and emphasized statutory limits on executive actions for White House alterations, driving trader consensus to an 82% implied probability of "No" unblocking by April 30. Public opposition earlier delayed National Capital Planning Commission review, while appeals or legislative approval face tight timelines amid partisan divides, with no immediate resolution signals. Historical precedent shows such injunctions often prolong disputes through higher courts.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes