Bipartisan legislation introduced March 23 by Senators John Curtis and Adam Schiff, the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, seeks to amend the Commodity Exchange Act and prohibit CFTC-registered designated contract markets like Kalshi from offering sports event contracts resembling gambling. Despite this and over a dozen similar bills since January targeting insider trading or specific bets, none have advanced past introduction amid the 119th Congress's packed agenda and looming lame-duck session. CFTC's recent advance notice of proposed rulemaking on event contracts, with comments due April 30, signals regulatory oversight over outright bans, while platforms implement self-imposed insider trading restrictions. Traders' 89.5% implied probability for "No" reflects historical low passage rates for restrictive gambling bills and the sports betting industry's $64 billion scale.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data · UpdatedLaw banning sports prediction markets enacted in 2026?
Law banning sports prediction markets enacted in 2026?
Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Market Opened: Mar 27, 2026, 1:53 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Bipartisan legislation introduced March 23 by Senators John Curtis and Adam Schiff, the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, seeks to amend the Commodity Exchange Act and prohibit CFTC-registered designated contract markets like Kalshi from offering sports event contracts resembling gambling. Despite this and over a dozen similar bills since January targeting insider trading or specific bets, none have advanced past introduction amid the 119th Congress's packed agenda and looming lame-duck session. CFTC's recent advance notice of proposed rulemaking on event contracts, with comments due April 30, signals regulatory oversight over outright bans, while platforms implement self-imposed insider trading restrictions. Traders' 89.5% implied probability for "No" reflects historical low passage rates for restrictive gambling bills and the sports betting industry's $64 billion scale.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data · Updated


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions