President Trump's January 21 announcement of a NATO-brokered "framework of a future deal" on Greenland—granting the US purported total military access at no cost—lifted trader consensus to 59.5% implied probability for signing by December 31, amid Arctic strategic rivalry with Russia and China. Early February remarks described negotiations as "pretty well agreed" and vital for national security, easing prior tariff and force threats after Davos talks with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Denmark and Greenland insist on no sovereignty loss, with protests underscoring resistance; vague terms resemble the 1951 defense pact. No major developments in the past 30 days leave ample time but highlight diplomatic uncertainty.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約 · 更新日はい
$49,878 Vol.
$49,878 Vol.
はい
$49,878 Vol.
$49,878 Vol.
Any U.S.–Danish agreement relating to Greenland will qualify, regardless of subject matter, including but not limited to sovereignty, governance, security arrangements, or access to natural resources.
Examples of qualifying deals include but are not limited to a treaty that makes any portion of Greenland a U.S. territory or possession (even if the handover date for such territory or possession is later); or, a Guantánamo-style arrangement treaty establishing a defined zone in Greenland under exclusive or primary U.S. jurisdiction and control, where Denmark and Greenland’s ordinary legal authority does not apply except by U.S. permission; or agreements permitting additional U.S. troop stationing, basing access, or resource extraction rights in Greenland.
This market will resolve to “Yes” only if a qualifying agreement is formally signed by authorized representatives of both Denmark and the United States. Official announcements, statements of intent, or declarations that an agreement has been reached will not suffice unless accompanied by signatures from both sides. Whether or not a qualifying deal is later passed by the respective parliaments or enters into force will not affect this market’s resolution. Signaling from Greenland’s population will not be considered.
Announcements, negotiations, proposals, frameworks, or understandings that are not formally signed by both parties will not qualify. Any qualifying U.S. jurisdiction, control, basing rights, or access arrangements in Greenland that existed at market creation will not count as new qualifying agreements.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States and Denmark; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
マーケット開始日: Jan 21, 2026, 5:59 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Any U.S.–Danish agreement relating to Greenland will qualify, regardless of subject matter, including but not limited to sovereignty, governance, security arrangements, or access to natural resources.
Examples of qualifying deals include but are not limited to a treaty that makes any portion of Greenland a U.S. territory or possession (even if the handover date for such territory or possession is later); or, a Guantánamo-style arrangement treaty establishing a defined zone in Greenland under exclusive or primary U.S. jurisdiction and control, where Denmark and Greenland’s ordinary legal authority does not apply except by U.S. permission; or agreements permitting additional U.S. troop stationing, basing access, or resource extraction rights in Greenland.
This market will resolve to “Yes” only if a qualifying agreement is formally signed by authorized representatives of both Denmark and the United States. Official announcements, statements of intent, or declarations that an agreement has been reached will not suffice unless accompanied by signatures from both sides. Whether or not a qualifying deal is later passed by the respective parliaments or enters into force will not affect this market’s resolution. Signaling from Greenland’s population will not be considered.
Announcements, negotiations, proposals, frameworks, or understandings that are not formally signed by both parties will not qualify. Any qualifying U.S. jurisdiction, control, basing rights, or access arrangements in Greenland that existed at market creation will not count as new qualifying agreements.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States and Denmark; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's January 21 announcement of a NATO-brokered "framework of a future deal" on Greenland—granting the US purported total military access at no cost—lifted trader consensus to 59.5% implied probability for signing by December 31, amid Arctic strategic rivalry with Russia and China. Early February remarks described negotiations as "pretty well agreed" and vital for national security, easing prior tariff and force threats after Davos talks with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Denmark and Greenland insist on no sovereignty loss, with protests underscoring resistance; vague terms resemble the 1951 defense pact. No major developments in the past 30 days leave ample time but highlight diplomatic uncertainty.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問