Trader consensus on Polymarket pegs a single dissent at the July 30-31 FOMC meeting as the frontrunner (45.5% implied probability), narrowly ahead of two dissents (38.5%), signaling expectations of limited hawkish resistance amid cooling inflation like June's softer CPI. June's unanimous rate hold masked underlying divisions exposed in the dot plot, where four officials projected zero 2024 cuts versus the median two, fueling bets on voices like Bowman or Logan dissenting against dovish projections. Historical rarity—zero dissents since July 2022—keeps 0 at just 12.5%, while three or more (50.5% combined) hinges on unexpectedly unified hawkishness; key differentiator is the updated Summary of Economic Projections, with resolution tied strictly to official vote tallies.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于3 33%
4+ 18%
0 12%
1 0
0
12%
1
50%
2
37%
3
33%
4+
18%
3 33%
4+ 18%
0 12%
1 0
0
12%
1
50%
2
37%
3
33%
4+
18%
This market will resolve according to the number of dissenting votes recorded at the next Federal Reserve Open Market Committee monetary policy meeting, specifically those dissenting on the Fed Funds Rate decision.
The resolution source for this market is the FOMC’s statement after its meeting scheduled for April 28-29, 2026, according to the official calendar: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm.
This market may resolve as soon as the FOMC’s statement for their April meeting with relevant data is issued; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
市场开放时间: Mar 19, 2026, 8:12 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Trader consensus on Polymarket pegs a single dissent at the July 30-31 FOMC meeting as the frontrunner (45.5% implied probability), narrowly ahead of two dissents (38.5%), signaling expectations of limited hawkish resistance amid cooling inflation like June's softer CPI. June's unanimous rate hold masked underlying divisions exposed in the dot plot, where four officials projected zero 2024 cuts versus the median two, fueling bets on voices like Bowman or Logan dissenting against dovish projections. Historical rarity—zero dissents since July 2022—keeps 0 at just 12.5%, while three or more (50.5% combined) hinges on unexpectedly unified hawkishness; key differentiator is the updated Summary of Economic Projections, with resolution tied strictly to official vote tallies.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题