Trader consensus on Polymarket prices exactly one dissent at the July 30-31 FOMC meeting at virtually 100%, reflecting divisions exposed in the June dot plot where only nine policymakers projected a 2024 rate cut versus four seeing none. This positioning stems from hawkish voices like Michelle Bowman and Lisa Cook signaling resistance to premature easing amid sticky inflation above 2%, echoing rare single dissents during past policy pivots like 2019. Supporting factors include unanimous June votes but heated minutes debate on cut timing, with CME FedWatch implying a hold. Challenges could arise from cooler July CPI (due July 11) fostering unity or unexpectedly hot data sparking multiple hawkish no's.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於1 100.0%
0 <1%
2 <1%
3 <1%
$0.00 交易量
$0.00 交易量
0
否
1
是
2
否
3
否
4人以上
否
1 100.0%
0 <1%
2 <1%
3 <1%
$0.00 交易量
$0.00 交易量
0
否
1
是
2
否
3
否
4人以上
否
This market will resolve according to the number of dissenting votes recorded at the next Federal Reserve Open Market Committee monetary policy meeting, specifically those dissenting on the Fed Funds Rate decision.
The resolution source for this market is the FOMC’s statement after its meeting scheduled for March 17-18, 2026, according to the official calendar: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm.
This market may resolve as soon as the FOMC’s statement for their March meeting with relevant data is issued; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
市場開放時間: Jan 29, 2026, 12:54 PM ET
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...已提議結果: 否
無爭議
最終結果: 否
This market will resolve according to the number of dissenting votes recorded at the next Federal Reserve Open Market Committee monetary policy meeting, specifically those dissenting on the Fed Funds Rate decision.
The resolution source for this market is the FOMC’s statement after its meeting scheduled for March 17-18, 2026, according to the official calendar: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm.
This market may resolve as soon as the FOMC’s statement for their March meeting with relevant data is issued; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...已提議結果: 否
無爭議
最終結果: 否
Trader consensus on Polymarket prices exactly one dissent at the July 30-31 FOMC meeting at virtually 100%, reflecting divisions exposed in the June dot plot where only nine policymakers projected a 2024 rate cut versus four seeing none. This positioning stems from hawkish voices like Michelle Bowman and Lisa Cook signaling resistance to premature easing amid sticky inflation above 2%, echoing rare single dissents during past policy pivots like 2019. Supporting factors include unanimous June votes but heated minutes debate on cut timing, with CME FedWatch implying a hold. Challenges could arise from cooler July CPI (due July 11) fostering unity or unexpectedly hot data sparking multiple hawkish no's.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions