Trader consensus heavily favors no 100% tariff on Canada by June 30, reflecting the absence of any official U.S. proposal for such an extreme measure amid President-elect Trump's focus on 25% tariffs tied to border security and fentanyl flows. Recent developments, including Trump's November threats against Canada and Mexico under USMCA rules, have prompted diplomatic pushback from Ottawa but no escalation to 100% levies, which would face legal hurdles, congressional review, and economic fallout given bilateral trade exceeding $1 trillion annually. High confidence stems from procedural timelines post-January 20 inauguration and lack of primary announcements. Realistic shifts could arise from failed negotiations or rhetorical hardening, though current evidence points to de-escalation talks.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於This market will resolve to “Yes” if a general 100% tariff rate or higher on imports into the United States from Canada goes into effect for any amount of time by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Only tariffs specifically targeting Canada will qualify. For example, a new global tariff (tariffs on all imports into the U.S.) will not count toward this market's resolution.
For the purpose of this market, "goes into effect" means the start date of the tariffs (as set by legislation or executive action) must have passed without being further delayed or suspended. Only tariffs which are in effect will qualify. Tariffs which are paused, or which have been announced but not yet gone into effect will not be considered.
The general tariff rate refers to the base tariff rate paid on imports, including any general tariff the U.S. imposes on all imports (e.g. a 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and a 50% tariff on top of that on Canadian imports would equal a 60% tariff). Item specific exceptions or increases will not be considered (i.e. this market does not refer to the effective tariff rate).
A general tariff that includes item specific exceptions will still qualify, as long as a policy of a general 100% tariff on all imports into the United States from Canada is in effect.
This market's primary resolution source will be official information from the Trump administration; however, a consensus of credible information will also be used.
市場開放時間: Jan 24, 2026, 12:35 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if a general 100% tariff rate or higher on imports into the United States from Canada goes into effect for any amount of time by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Only tariffs specifically targeting Canada will qualify. For example, a new global tariff (tariffs on all imports into the U.S.) will not count toward this market's resolution.
For the purpose of this market, "goes into effect" means the start date of the tariffs (as set by legislation or executive action) must have passed without being further delayed or suspended. Only tariffs which are in effect will qualify. Tariffs which are paused, or which have been announced but not yet gone into effect will not be considered.
The general tariff rate refers to the base tariff rate paid on imports, including any general tariff the U.S. imposes on all imports (e.g. a 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and a 50% tariff on top of that on Canadian imports would equal a 60% tariff). Item specific exceptions or increases will not be considered (i.e. this market does not refer to the effective tariff rate).
A general tariff that includes item specific exceptions will still qualify, as long as a policy of a general 100% tariff on all imports into the United States from Canada is in effect.
This market's primary resolution source will be official information from the Trump administration; however, a consensus of credible information will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus heavily favors no 100% tariff on Canada by June 30, reflecting the absence of any official U.S. proposal for such an extreme measure amid President-elect Trump's focus on 25% tariffs tied to border security and fentanyl flows. Recent developments, including Trump's November threats against Canada and Mexico under USMCA rules, have prompted diplomatic pushback from Ottawa but no escalation to 100% levies, which would face legal hurdles, congressional review, and economic fallout given bilateral trade exceeding $1 trillion annually. High confidence stems from procedural timelines post-January 20 inauguration and lack of primary announcements. Realistic shifts could arise from failed negotiations or rhetorical hardening, though current evidence points to de-escalation talks.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions