Trader sentiment on the All-In Podcast's March 27 episode tilts heavily toward political discussions, with market-implied odds at 65% for coverage of the 2024 U.S. presidential race, driven by recent Trump-Biden debate buzz and host David Sacks' vocal commentary on election integrity via X posts. This eclipses AI and crypto topics (25% and 10% respectively), amid hosts' pattern of reacting to timely headlines like Nvidia's GTC announcements and Fed rate signals. Key context: episodes resolve on explicit mentions; watch pre-episode host tweets for hints, as past shows pivoted last-minute on breaking news like OpenAI drama, underscoring prediction markets' sensitivity to real-time catalysts over scripted agendas.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于AI / Artificial Intelligence 20+ times
65%
Data Center 8+ times
41%
Anthropic
58%
Dario / Amodei
62%
Sam / Altman
52%
Department of War
43%
Seminar
42%
Nvidia
74%
Tesla
44%
Palantir
44%
Iran
90%
Regulation
53%
Safety
44%
Alignment
44%
New York
43%
California
44%
Silicon Valley
44%
Best Friend
42%
China
52%
Trump
93%
OpenAI
57%
$1,556 交易量
AI / Artificial Intelligence 20+ times
65%
Data Center 8+ times
41%
Anthropic
58%
Dario / Amodei
62%
Sam / Altman
52%
Department of War
43%
Seminar
42%
Nvidia
74%
Tesla
44%
Palantir
44%
Iran
90%
Regulation
53%
Safety
44%
Alignment
44%
New York
43%
California
44%
Silicon Valley
44%
Best Friend
42%
China
52%
Trump
93%
OpenAI
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed term is mentioned by anyone during the next released episode of the All-In Podcast. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No".
If clips of old episodes or prerecorded clips are aired where people are speaking, those clips will count toward this market's resolution.
AI-generated audio or video will count toward this market's resolution.
Any usage of the term, regardless of context, will count toward the resolution of this market.
Plural and possessive forms of the listed term will count toward the resolution of this market regardless of context; however, other forms will NOT count.
Instances where the term is used in a compound word will count regardless of context (e.g. joyful is not a compound word for "joy," however "killjoy" is a compounding of the words "kill" and "joy").
If this market requires a specified number of mentions of a person’s first or last name, a full-name mention will count as one mention (e.g., if a market is about “Joe / Biden 5+ times,” a mention of “Joe Biden” will count once).
This market will resolve according to the next episode of the All-In Podcast added to the official YouTube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5MTSAqaf8peDZQ57QkJBzewJU1aUokl. Specials or other videos posted on the YouTube channel but not included on the All-In Podcast playlist will not be considered.
If no such episode of the All-In Podcast is aired by April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No".
The resolution source will be audio of the event.
市场开放时间: Mar 23, 2026, 12:38 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader sentiment on the All-In Podcast's March 27 episode tilts heavily toward political discussions, with market-implied odds at 65% for coverage of the 2024 U.S. presidential race, driven by recent Trump-Biden debate buzz and host David Sacks' vocal commentary on election integrity via X posts. This eclipses AI and crypto topics (25% and 10% respectively), amid hosts' pattern of reacting to timely headlines like Nvidia's GTC announcements and Fed rate signals. Key context: episodes resolve on explicit mentions; watch pre-episode host tweets for hints, as past shows pivoted last-minute on breaking news like OpenAI drama, underscoring prediction markets' sensitivity to real-time catalysts over scripted agendas.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题