President Trump's announcement on April 2, 2026, removing Attorney General Pam Bondi—whose tenure was shadowed by unfulfilled promises to review Jeffrey Epstein's purported "client list"—has intensified scrutiny on Department of Justice handling of Epstein files. The DOJ released over 3.5 million pages on January 30 pursuant to the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act, but officials including FBI confirmed no such client list exists among the documents. House Oversight Committee testimony from Epstein's accountant in March identified five direct payers—Rothschilds, Les Wexner, Leon Black, Glenn Dubin, and Steven Sinofsky—without constituting a formal list. Congressional probes continue, with a new attorney general nomination process potentially influencing further disclosures or resolutions. Traders assess low likelihood of a dedicated list emerging absent new evidence.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten · Aktualisiert$3,936,764 Vol.
30. Juni
12%
$3,936,764 Vol.
30. Juni
12%
To qualify, the files must contain names in a context equivalent to what is commonly referred to as Epstein’s “client list”—that is, a document that explicitly identifies a list or set of individuals as being directly connected to, participating in, facilitating, funding, soliciting, or otherwise being implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal activities.
A document may qualify even if it does not contain explicit incriminating language on its face, so long as credible reporting or accompanying official context confirms that the released document is an incriminating client list or functionally equivalent roster of individuals tied to Epstein’s illegal activity.
The following will not qualify:
- Flight logs, passenger manifests, visitor logs, or transportation records which merely show individuals traveling with, meeting with, or visiting Epstein without any explicit or contextual tie to criminal activity.
- Contact books, address lists, social calendars, guest lists, schedules, correspondence logs, or similar documents that include names solely due to social contact, proximity, acquaintance, or logistical interaction with Epstein.
- Any document listing individuals without accompanying language, context, or credible reporting that connects those individuals to Epstein’s illegal activity.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be the released files themselves and a consensus of credible reporting.
Markt eröffnet: Dec 22, 2025, 7:54 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Ja
Umstritten
Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Ja
Umstritten
Endgültige Überprüfung
To qualify, the files must contain names in a context equivalent to what is commonly referred to as Epstein’s “client list”—that is, a document that explicitly identifies a list or set of individuals as being directly connected to, participating in, facilitating, funding, soliciting, or otherwise being implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal activities.
A document may qualify even if it does not contain explicit incriminating language on its face, so long as credible reporting or accompanying official context confirms that the released document is an incriminating client list or functionally equivalent roster of individuals tied to Epstein’s illegal activity.
The following will not qualify:
- Flight logs, passenger manifests, visitor logs, or transportation records which merely show individuals traveling with, meeting with, or visiting Epstein without any explicit or contextual tie to criminal activity.
- Contact books, address lists, social calendars, guest lists, schedules, correspondence logs, or similar documents that include names solely due to social contact, proximity, acquaintance, or logistical interaction with Epstein.
- Any document listing individuals without accompanying language, context, or credible reporting that connects those individuals to Epstein’s illegal activity.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be the released files themselves and a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Ja
Umstritten
Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Ja
Umstritten
Endgültige Überprüfung
President Trump's announcement on April 2, 2026, removing Attorney General Pam Bondi—whose tenure was shadowed by unfulfilled promises to review Jeffrey Epstein's purported "client list"—has intensified scrutiny on Department of Justice handling of Epstein files. The DOJ released over 3.5 million pages on January 30 pursuant to the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act, but officials including FBI confirmed no such client list exists among the documents. House Oversight Committee testimony from Epstein's accountant in March identified five direct payers—Rothschilds, Les Wexner, Leon Black, Glenn Dubin, and Steven Sinofsky—without constituting a formal list. Congressional probes continue, with a new attorney general nomination process potentially influencing further disclosures or resolutions. Traders assess low likelihood of a dedicated list emerging absent new evidence.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen