The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Trump's January 2025 executive order restricting birthright citizenship to children with at least one U.S. citizen parent, a direct test of 14th Amendment protections affirmed in the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark precedent. Traders' 80.5% implied probability for SCOTUS striking down the EO reflects skepticism over reinterpreting constitutional jus soli citizenship via executive action, even with a 6-3 conservative majority including Trump appointees, amid lower court injunctions and historical resistance to unilateral changes. President Trump's attendance at arguments underscores stakes, but consensus anticipates judicial invalidation barring extraordinary reversal, with a ruling expected by summer term end.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於$16,608 交易量
$16,608 交易量
$16,608 交易量
$16,608 交易量
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市場開放時間: Mar 31, 2026, 2:54 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Trump's January 2025 executive order restricting birthright citizenship to children with at least one U.S. citizen parent, a direct test of 14th Amendment protections affirmed in the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark precedent. Traders' 80.5% implied probability for SCOTUS striking down the EO reflects skepticism over reinterpreting constitutional jus soli citizenship via executive action, even with a 6-3 conservative majority including Trump appointees, amid lower court injunctions and historical resistance to unilateral changes. President Trump's attendance at arguments underscores stakes, but consensus anticipates judicial invalidation barring extraordinary reversal, with a ruling expected by summer term end.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions