Trader consensus prices "No" at 93.5% for a U.S. invasion of Greenland in 2026, driven by President Trump's January 21 Davos pledge ruling out military force to acquire the Danish autonomous territory, shifting focus to diplomatic negotiations. Subsequent talks involving U.S., Danish, and Greenlandic officials—starting January 28—have centered on expanded U.S. military access and new bases at existing sites like Thule Air Base, rather than annexation or invasion. Denmark's revelation of contingency plans to sabotage runways underscored allied resolve, while a U.S. congressional bill blocks funding for hostile actions. Absent military mobilization or escalatory rhetoric amid NATO obligations, traders see negligible invasion risk despite Trump's persistent acquisition interest. Late-breaking diplomatic breakdowns or Arctic security shifts remain remote catalysts for change.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · AtualizadoOs EUA vão invadir a Groenlândia em 2026?
Os EUA vão invadir a Groenlândia em 2026?
Sim
$1,266,530 Vol.
$1,266,530 Vol.
Sim
$1,266,530 Vol.
$1,266,530 Vol.
For the purposes of this market, the land territory of Greenland refers to all territory recognized by Denmark as part of the autonomous territory of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, as of market creation.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado Aberto: Jan 5, 2026, 2:12 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, the land territory of Greenland refers to all territory recognized by Denmark as part of the autonomous territory of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, as of market creation.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus prices "No" at 93.5% for a U.S. invasion of Greenland in 2026, driven by President Trump's January 21 Davos pledge ruling out military force to acquire the Danish autonomous territory, shifting focus to diplomatic negotiations. Subsequent talks involving U.S., Danish, and Greenlandic officials—starting January 28—have centered on expanded U.S. military access and new bases at existing sites like Thule Air Base, rather than annexation or invasion. Denmark's revelation of contingency plans to sabotage runways underscored allied resolve, while a U.S. congressional bill blocks funding for hostile actions. Absent military mobilization or escalatory rhetoric amid NATO obligations, traders see negligible invasion risk despite Trump's persistent acquisition interest. Late-breaking diplomatic breakdowns or Arctic security shifts remain remote catalysts for change.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions