Congressional gridlock and partisan splits over AI oversight scope underpin the narrow trader consensus of 53% implied probability against a U.S. AI safety bill before 2027. Recent catalysts include stalled bipartisan Senate AI roadmaps, narrow House AI labeling votes, and California Governor Newsom's veto of a state safety measure, highlighting regulatory hesitancy amid tech lobbying. President-elect Trump's deregulatory signals and industry pushback counter growing safety concerns from AI incidents and international precedents like the EU AI Act. Lame-duck session compromises or high-profile risks could boost Yes odds, while new Republican majorities likely entrench inertia.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · AtualizadoSim
$70,136 Vol.
$70,136 Vol.
Sim
$70,136 Vol.
$70,136 Vol.
- Prohibition on Creation or Release: Forbids the creation or release of specific AI systems or models.
- Training Restrictions: Sets limits on how AI systems can be trained, such as restricting access to previously available training data or imposing a maximum limit on the number of parameters used for training.
- Usage Restrictions: Prevents AI systems from being used in certain applications, such as interacting with customers, interfacing with other applications, or performing actions on the web.
- Human-in-the-Loop Requirements: Requires AI systems to include mechanisms ensuring human oversight or involvement in their operation.
Otherwise this market will resolve to "No".
The resolution source will be official U.S. federal government (e.g., Congress.gov) however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado Aberto: Nov 12, 2025, 5:08 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...- Prohibition on Creation or Release: Forbids the creation or release of specific AI systems or models.
- Training Restrictions: Sets limits on how AI systems can be trained, such as restricting access to previously available training data or imposing a maximum limit on the number of parameters used for training.
- Usage Restrictions: Prevents AI systems from being used in certain applications, such as interacting with customers, interfacing with other applications, or performing actions on the web.
- Human-in-the-Loop Requirements: Requires AI systems to include mechanisms ensuring human oversight or involvement in their operation.
Otherwise this market will resolve to "No".
The resolution source will be official U.S. federal government (e.g., Congress.gov) however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Congressional gridlock and partisan splits over AI oversight scope underpin the narrow trader consensus of 53% implied probability against a U.S. AI safety bill before 2027. Recent catalysts include stalled bipartisan Senate AI roadmaps, narrow House AI labeling votes, and California Governor Newsom's veto of a state safety measure, highlighting regulatory hesitancy amid tech lobbying. President-elect Trump's deregulatory signals and industry pushback counter growing safety concerns from AI incidents and international precedents like the EU AI Act. Lame-duck session compromises or high-profile risks could boost Yes odds, while new Republican majorities likely entrench inertia.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions