Trader consensus at 96.1% for "No" reflects the absence of any state legislative bills on secession advancing to a floor vote, reinforced by Supreme Court precedent in Texas v. White (1869) declaring unilateral secession unconstitutional without congressional consent. Fringe movements like Texit in Texas or Calexit in California emphasize rhetoric or ballot initiatives rather than legislative action, with no developments in the past 30 days—such as Texas House Speaker's March 26 directive to study New Mexico county transfers, not state independence—altering this dynamic. State sessions continue through mid-2026, but procedural hurdles, bipartisan opposition, and lack of momentum make a vote by June 30 improbable; only a profound national crisis could shift odds.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於2026年6月30日前,美國州議會有投票決定分離嗎?
2026年6月30日前,美國州議會有投票決定分離嗎?
是
$21,685 交易量
$21,685 交易量
是
$21,685 交易量
$21,685 交易量
A qualifying measure must clearly state its purpose as part of a process for the state to leave, withdraw from, dissolve political ties with, declare independence from, or otherwise terminate its membership in the United States; measures which merely study, explore, or explain a possibility of secession or independence will not qualify. Informal measures of consensus taking such as straw polls or whip counts will not qualify toward this market's resolution.
A vote on a resolution or other statement without binding legal effect but declaring the state's explicit support for secession will qualify toward this market's resolution.
Only a vote taken by a full chamber will qualify toward this market's resolution. Votes held by committees/subcommittees, etc., will not qualify.
This market's primary resolution source will be official records of qualifying votes from relevant state governments, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
市場開放時間: Oct 8, 2025, 3:27 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...A qualifying measure must clearly state its purpose as part of a process for the state to leave, withdraw from, dissolve political ties with, declare independence from, or otherwise terminate its membership in the United States; measures which merely study, explore, or explain a possibility of secession or independence will not qualify. Informal measures of consensus taking such as straw polls or whip counts will not qualify toward this market's resolution.
A vote on a resolution or other statement without binding legal effect but declaring the state's explicit support for secession will qualify toward this market's resolution.
Only a vote taken by a full chamber will qualify toward this market's resolution. Votes held by committees/subcommittees, etc., will not qualify.
This market's primary resolution source will be official records of qualifying votes from relevant state governments, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus at 96.1% for "No" reflects the absence of any state legislative bills on secession advancing to a floor vote, reinforced by Supreme Court precedent in Texas v. White (1869) declaring unilateral secession unconstitutional without congressional consent. Fringe movements like Texit in Texas or Calexit in California emphasize rhetoric or ballot initiatives rather than legislative action, with no developments in the past 30 days—such as Texas House Speaker's March 26 directive to study New Mexico county transfers, not state independence—altering this dynamic. State sessions continue through mid-2026, but procedural hurdles, bipartisan opposition, and lack of momentum make a vote by June 30 improbable; only a profound national crisis could shift odds.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions