Trader consensus heavily favors no federal law banning sports prediction markets in 2026 at 89.5%, driven by the early-stage status of recent bipartisan bills like Sens. Schiff and Curtis's measure (introduced March 23) and Reps. Raskin and Merkley's STOP Corrupt Bets Act (March 26), which target sports event contracts on CFTC-regulated platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi. These proposals face steep legislative hurdles in a divided Congress, including committee advancement and floor votes, amid competing priorities like appropriations. The CFTC's February withdrawal of restrictive event contract rules and March guidance affirming jurisdiction over sports contracts signal regulatory permissiveness, reducing enactment urgency despite state-level actions like Massachusetts's January ban. No hearings or whip counts indicate momentum.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · ОбновленоЗакон, запрещающий рынки спортивных прогнозов, принятый в 2026 году?
Закон, запрещающий рынки спортивных прогнозов, принятый в 2026 году?
Да
Да
Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Открытие рынка: Mar 27, 2026, 1:53 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Any bill that prohibits federally regulated prediction markets from offering sports betting contracts, or otherwise places such activities under state-level gambling regulation rather than federal regulatory oversight, will qualify for a “Yes” resolution.
Qualifying legislation may include joint resolutions and must pass both the House and the Senate, and must be signed by the President, become law without signature while Congress remains in session, or become law through veto override. Presidential pocket vetoes that expire resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US federal government and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC); however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus heavily favors no federal law banning sports prediction markets in 2026 at 89.5%, driven by the early-stage status of recent bipartisan bills like Sens. Schiff and Curtis's measure (introduced March 23) and Reps. Raskin and Merkley's STOP Corrupt Bets Act (March 26), which target sports event contracts on CFTC-regulated platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi. These proposals face steep legislative hurdles in a divided Congress, including committee advancement and floor votes, amid competing priorities like appropriations. The CFTC's February withdrawal of restrictive event contract rules and March guidance affirming jurisdiction over sports contracts signal regulatory permissiveness, reducing enactment urgency despite state-level actions like Massachusetts's January ban. No hearings or whip counts indicate momentum.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы