Trader consensus heavily favors no passage of an Iran war powers resolution by April 30, reflecting procedural gridlock and scant legislative momentum amid ongoing U.S.-Iran tensions. A bipartisan measure led by Rep. Ro Khanna in the House and Sen. Tim Kaine in the Senate seeks to curb presidential military actions without congressional approval, spurred by Iran's April 13-14 missile and drone barrage on Israel and subsequent U.S. defensive support. However, the resolutions remain stuck in committees with no floor votes scheduled before the deadline, as Congress prioritizes other priorities during its spring recess. Historical base rates show such war powers efforts rarely advance quickly, reinforcing the 86.5% implied probability on "No" as traders weigh partisan divisions and White House assurances against escalation.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · ОбновленоLegislation will qualify as seeking to limit U.S. armed forces military action in the recent US/Israel–Iran conflict if it explicitly seeks to restrict, terminate, or require congressional approval for U.S. armed forces’ hostilities, strikes, deployments, or other military operations against Iran or its proxy forces. Non-binding statements or measures that express disapproval, call for investigation, or otherwise relate to the US/Israel-Iran conflict without seeking to limit military action will not qualify.
A measure amended by either chamber will only qualify if the amended version is subsequently finally passed by both chambers in identical form.
The resolution sources will be official congressional voting records and a consensus of credible reporting.
Открытие рынка: Mar 24, 2026, 4:53 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Legislation will qualify as seeking to limit U.S. armed forces military action in the recent US/Israel–Iran conflict if it explicitly seeks to restrict, terminate, or require congressional approval for U.S. armed forces’ hostilities, strikes, deployments, or other military operations against Iran or its proxy forces. Non-binding statements or measures that express disapproval, call for investigation, or otherwise relate to the US/Israel-Iran conflict without seeking to limit military action will not qualify.
A measure amended by either chamber will only qualify if the amended version is subsequently finally passed by both chambers in identical form.
The resolution sources will be official congressional voting records and a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus heavily favors no passage of an Iran war powers resolution by April 30, reflecting procedural gridlock and scant legislative momentum amid ongoing U.S.-Iran tensions. A bipartisan measure led by Rep. Ro Khanna in the House and Sen. Tim Kaine in the Senate seeks to curb presidential military actions without congressional approval, spurred by Iran's April 13-14 missile and drone barrage on Israel and subsequent U.S. defensive support. However, the resolutions remain stuck in committees with no floor votes scheduled before the deadline, as Congress prioritizes other priorities during its spring recess. Historical base rates show such war powers efforts rarely advance quickly, reinforcing the 86.5% implied probability on "No" as traders weigh partisan divisions and White House assurances against escalation.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы