Trader consensus overwhelmingly favors "No" at 99.4% implied probability, reflecting the rarity of ambassador expulsions among NATO allies and EU partners, which typically require extreme provocations like espionage scandals or wartime ruptures—none of which have materialized recently. Absent any verified diplomatic breakdowns, such as formal protests escalating beyond ambassador summons over issues like Ukraine aid or Gaza policy, US envoys remain securely posted across Europe. With Donald Trump's January 20 inauguration approaching, potential trade tariffs or foreign policy shifts could strain bilateral relations, but historical precedents show such tensions rarely lead to expulsions before sustained escalation; realistic upset scenarios include major spying revelations or military incidents before March 31 resolution.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jourUn pays européen va-t-il expulser un ambassadeur américain d'ici le 31 mars ?
Un pays européen va-t-il expulser un ambassadeur américain d'ici le 31 mars ?
Oui
$41,166 Vol.
$41,166 Vol.
Oui
$41,166 Vol.
$41,166 Vol.
Any expulsion from a European country where a U.S. ambassador is assigned as of the time of this market’s creation will qualify.
For the purposes of this market, a “European country” is defined as any of the following sovereign states: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and Vatican City.
For the purposes of resolving this market, an official announcement that a U.S. ambassador will be or is being expelled will suffice regardless of whether or not the respective ambassador leaves the country within this market’s timeframe.
Qualifying announcements must be definitive, unambiguous, official statements issued by an authorized governmental person or entity.
Whether the ambassador resigns, is recalled, or otherwise departs voluntarily will have no bearing on the resolution of this market.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of the United States, including the U.S. Department of State, as well as official information from the relevant expelling government; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Marché ouvert : Mar 9, 2026, 11:22 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Any expulsion from a European country where a U.S. ambassador is assigned as of the time of this market’s creation will qualify.
For the purposes of this market, a “European country” is defined as any of the following sovereign states: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and Vatican City.
For the purposes of resolving this market, an official announcement that a U.S. ambassador will be or is being expelled will suffice regardless of whether or not the respective ambassador leaves the country within this market’s timeframe.
Qualifying announcements must be definitive, unambiguous, official statements issued by an authorized governmental person or entity.
Whether the ambassador resigns, is recalled, or otherwise departs voluntarily will have no bearing on the resolution of this market.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of the United States, including the U.S. Department of State, as well as official information from the relevant expelling government; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus overwhelmingly favors "No" at 99.4% implied probability, reflecting the rarity of ambassador expulsions among NATO allies and EU partners, which typically require extreme provocations like espionage scandals or wartime ruptures—none of which have materialized recently. Absent any verified diplomatic breakdowns, such as formal protests escalating beyond ambassador summons over issues like Ukraine aid or Gaza policy, US envoys remain securely posted across Europe. With Donald Trump's January 20 inauguration approaching, potential trade tariffs or foreign policy shifts could strain bilateral relations, but historical precedents show such tensions rarely lead to expulsions before sustained escalation; realistic upset scenarios include major spying revelations or military incidents before March 31 resolution.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes