Trader consensus reflects 96.3% implied probability on "No" for Iran sabotaging undersea internet cables by April 30, driven by the absence of any confirmed deliberate actions despite IRGC threats in late March to target submarine cables in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea amid escalating US-Iran conflict. Ongoing hostilities have halted projects like Meta's 2Africa Pearls without verified cuts, as historical precedents show deliberate sabotage rare due to mutual retaliation risks, self-inflicted connectivity harm to Iran, and attribution challenges favoring accidents like anchor drags. Recent fact-checks debunk exaggerated viral claims of imminent global blackouts. Realistic shifts could stem from late escalation, such as proxy Houthi strikes or direct IRGC naval operations credibly linked to Iran before the deadline.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoO Irã vai sabotar os cabos submarinos de internet até 30 de abril?
O Irã vai sabotar os cabos submarinos de internet até 30 de abril?
Sim
$97,158 Vol.
$97,158 Vol.
Sim
$97,158 Vol.
$97,158 Vol.
Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado Aberto: Mar 23, 2026, 6:23 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus reflects 96.3% implied probability on "No" for Iran sabotaging undersea internet cables by April 30, driven by the absence of any confirmed deliberate actions despite IRGC threats in late March to target submarine cables in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea amid escalating US-Iran conflict. Ongoing hostilities have halted projects like Meta's 2Africa Pearls without verified cuts, as historical precedents show deliberate sabotage rare due to mutual retaliation risks, self-inflicted connectivity harm to Iran, and attribution challenges favoring accidents like anchor drags. Recent fact-checks debunk exaggerated viral claims of imminent global blackouts. Realistic shifts could stem from late escalation, such as proxy Houthi strikes or direct IRGC naval operations credibly linked to Iran before the deadline.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions