Trader consensus on Polymarket assigns low probabilities to major powers joining the Board of Peace by March 31, driven by the absence of formal diplomatic commitments or treaty negotiations from key nations like the US, China, or Russia. Recent developments include exploratory talks at the UN General Assembly in September, where neutral countries such as Switzerland and Norway expressed interest but stopped short of endorsements, amid geopolitical tensions in Ukraine and the Middle East stalling broader participation. No primary announcements have materialized, heightening uncertainty. Traders eye upcoming G20 foreign ministers' meetings in February as a potential catalyst, though historical base rates for new international boards suggest slow adoption without superpower buy-in.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour$2,322,636 Vol.
Inde
3%
Chine
3%
Brésil
2%
Royaume-Uni
2%
Italie
2%
Belgique
1%
Suède
1%
Espagne
1%
Allemagne
1%
Finlande
1%
France
1%
Norvège
1%
Ukraine
1%
Danemark
1%
Pays-Bas
1%
Suisse
1%
Russie
<1%
Palestine
<1%
$2,322,636 Vol.
Inde
3%
Chine
3%
Brésil
2%
Royaume-Uni
2%
Italie
2%
Belgique
1%
Suède
1%
Espagne
1%
Allemagne
1%
Finlande
1%
France
1%
Norvège
1%
Ukraine
1%
Danemark
1%
Pays-Bas
1%
Suisse
1%
Russie
<1%
Palestine
<1%
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the listed country joins the Board of Peace by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A country will be considered to have joined the Board of Peace if either of the following conditions are met:
- That country's government publicly and definitively announces that the country will join the Board of Peace as a founding member, permanent member, or as any other type of member state.
- Official information from the country’s government or a consensus of credible reporting demonstrates that the listed country has formally joined the Board of Peace (e.g. an authorized representative has signed the charter of the Board of Peace).
Only statements or announcements which are definitive in their expression of intent to join the Board of Peace will qualify (e.g. “we agree to join the board of peace,” “we accepted an invitation to the board of peace,” etc.). Statements which are not definitive in their expression of intent to join (e.g. “we agree in principle”, “we will join pending further details”, “we are ready to do our part in working for the reconstruction of Gaza” etc.) will not count.
Qualifying announcements within this market’s timeframe will count regardless of when the relevant country intends to join the board of peace, or whether or not they ultimately join.
Statements from Donald Trump or the US government will not alone qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of the listed country; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Marché ouvert : Jan 21, 2026, 2:29 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus on Polymarket assigns low probabilities to major powers joining the Board of Peace by March 31, driven by the absence of formal diplomatic commitments or treaty negotiations from key nations like the US, China, or Russia. Recent developments include exploratory talks at the UN General Assembly in September, where neutral countries such as Switzerland and Norway expressed interest but stopped short of endorsements, amid geopolitical tensions in Ukraine and the Middle East stalling broader participation. No primary announcements have materialized, heightening uncertainty. Traders eye upcoming G20 foreign ministers' meetings in February as a potential catalyst, though historical base rates for new international boards suggest slow adoption without superpower buy-in.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes