Trader consensus on Polymarket heavily favors no Iranian sabotage of undersea internet cables by April 30, with "No" shares at 92.5% implied probability, driven by the absence of official Iranian threats, intelligence reports, or preparatory indicators. Recent Middle East escalations, including Iran's missile barrages against Israel and Houthi disruptions in the Red Sea, have focused on aerial and proxy maritime actions rather than direct undersea infrastructure attacks, which carry high detection risks and escalation costs. No verified incidents link Tehran to cable damage, unlike suspected Russian or Chinese activities elsewhere, reinforcing low-risk assessment amid diplomatic pressures and sanctions. Traders await any April signals from IAEA talks or U.S. warnings.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · ОбновленоБудет ли Иран саботировать подводные интернет-кабели к 30 апреля?
Будет ли Иран саботировать подводные интернет-кабели к 30 апреля?
Да
$12,308 Объем
$12,308 Объем
Да
$12,308 Объем
$12,308 Объем
Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Открытие рынка: Mar 23, 2026, 6:23 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus on Polymarket heavily favors no Iranian sabotage of undersea internet cables by April 30, with "No" shares at 92.5% implied probability, driven by the absence of official Iranian threats, intelligence reports, or preparatory indicators. Recent Middle East escalations, including Iran's missile barrages against Israel and Houthi disruptions in the Red Sea, have focused on aerial and proxy maritime actions rather than direct undersea infrastructure attacks, which carry high detection risks and escalation costs. No verified incidents link Tehran to cable damage, unlike suspected Russian or Chinese activities elsewhere, reinforcing low-risk assessment amid diplomatic pressures and sanctions. Traders await any April signals from IAEA talks or U.S. warnings.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы