Trader consensus heavily favors "No" at 93% for Iran sabotaging undersea internet cables by April 30, driven by the absence of any verified incidents or intelligence linking Tehran directly to such actions amid its recent military exchanges with Israel. Iran's April 13 drone-and-missile retaliation to an Israeli strike in Syria prompted a limited Israeli airstrike near Isfahan on April 19, but both sides signaled de-escalation through measured responses and diplomatic channels, avoiding broader infrastructure attacks. Separate Red Sea cable disruptions have been attributed to Houthi rebels rather than Iran itself. With the deadline imminent and no escalation indicators like threats or mobilizations, traders view strategic restraint and technical barriers as outweighing speculative sabotage risks, though late-breaking military developments could shift odds.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于是
$14,378 交易量
$14,378 交易量
是
$14,378 交易量
$14,378 交易量
Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间: Mar 23, 2026, 6:23 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus heavily favors "No" at 93% for Iran sabotaging undersea internet cables by April 30, driven by the absence of any verified incidents or intelligence linking Tehran directly to such actions amid its recent military exchanges with Israel. Iran's April 13 drone-and-missile retaliation to an Israeli strike in Syria prompted a limited Israeli airstrike near Isfahan on April 19, but both sides signaled de-escalation through measured responses and diplomatic channels, avoiding broader infrastructure attacks. Separate Red Sea cable disruptions have been attributed to Houthi rebels rather than Iran itself. With the deadline imminent and no escalation indicators like threats or mobilizations, traders view strategic restraint and technical barriers as outweighing speculative sabotage risks, though late-breaking military developments could shift odds.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题