Amid escalating US-Iran hostilities since mid-March 2026, including Iranian deployment of sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz and Houthi threats in the Red Sea, reported warnings from Iranian officials and proxies to target undersea cables carrying up to 17% of global internet traffic have failed to result in any verified sabotage. Projects like Meta's 2Africa Pearls remain paused due to force majeure in the Persian Gulf, heightening vulnerabilities, yet cables stay intact despite prior accidental Red Sea cuts in 2025 attributed to shipping. Trader consensus at 94.5% "No" reflects deterrence from severe retaliation risks, self-inflicted connectivity losses for Iran, and logistical challenges in contested waters, though further military escalation or proxy actions could shift odds before April 30 resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於是
$31,162 交易量
$31,162 交易量
是
$31,162 交易量
$31,162 交易量
Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: Mar 23, 2026, 6:23 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Amid escalating US-Iran hostilities since mid-March 2026, including Iranian deployment of sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz and Houthi threats in the Red Sea, reported warnings from Iranian officials and proxies to target undersea cables carrying up to 17% of global internet traffic have failed to result in any verified sabotage. Projects like Meta's 2Africa Pearls remain paused due to force majeure in the Persian Gulf, heightening vulnerabilities, yet cables stay intact despite prior accidental Red Sea cuts in 2025 attributed to shipping. Trader consensus at 94.5% "No" reflects deterrence from severe retaliation risks, self-inflicted connectivity losses for Iran, and logistical challenges in contested waters, though further military escalation or proxy actions could shift odds before April 30 resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions