Ethereum ETF approved by May 31?

So where is the approval? :D

@adorableraccoon.eth Are you suing yet? They fucked you over big time.

When starts the ETH ETF trading since it's approved? Oh wait, because it NOT has been approved yet!

Nos got rug pulled real hard lmfao

1/2 is still not approved etf. bruh

It`s 1 of June, NO S-1 approved, NO Ethereum ETF approved.

Hey Polymarket, it's the first of June, where is the Ethereum ETF?

vpn

venue

venu

This market is all about time. The fact that ETF "will" eventually be approved does not mean that it will be approved by May 31st. Polymarket team has to be responsible for creating a market will so ambiguous rule. So disappointed to their cowardness

maybe

Former U.S. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said approval of trading in spot Ethereum ETFs would be inevitable, having received approval to list, but approval of the products themselves is still pending, with the expectation that the funds could begin trading in July or August. Source theblock

That clarification was rigging the shit

TIL: There seems to be a correlation between whiny bitches and bad readers

this is fraud. hope somebody sues them

THe funniest thing is that you can exit the bet after a little pump contrary to traditional betting

Yeaah boy!

Congratz to all believers (especially before May 20). Well earned. I voted No, but I agree with the outcome.

Dispute this. form 19b-4 is just a amendement. Official registration form S-1 is not approved whats going on here

The result of this bet is incorrect! ETH ETF has not yet been approved. It needs the S-1 documents approval i first to be tradable. I want to dispute this result!

What woud happen if s-1 does not get approved?

James Seyffart: "TO BE CLEAR: This does not mean they will begin trading tomorrow. This is just 19b-4 approval. Also needs to be an approval on the S-1 documents which is going to take time. We’re expecting it to take a couple weeks but could take longer. Should know more within a week or so!"

lol, ETF is approved but you guy still find a way to tell ETF os not approved

Think it ultimately ended up being an expedient resolution, and a bit of a scammy resolution.

our dearest rudev was correct, and I am rekt

Doesn't seem to matter what I do I'm always number two No one knows how hard I tried, oh-oh, I I have feelings that I can't explain Drivin' me insane All my life, been so polite But I'll sleep alone tonight 'Cause I'm just Ken, anywhere else I'd be a ten Is it my destiny to live and die a life of blonde fragility? I'm just Ken Where I see love, she sees a friend What will it take for her to see the man behind the tan and fight for me?

750 USDC to dispute? This site is rigged. (I didn't place any bet)

Cope harder

there are 20 minutes left in order to dispute it if anyone wants to do it https://oracle.uma.xyz/?project=Polymarket

Rigged..... What woud happen if s-1 does not get approved?

The best resolution would be to make it a 50/50 split and clarify that the rules were not sufficient to select a clear winner.

How convenient that the additional context just mentions half the sentence of the SEC. The full sentence is: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, that the Proposals be, and hereby are, approved on an accelerated basis." This clearly indicates that the approval pertains specifically to the proposals under Section 19(b)(2) and does not encompass the entire approval process for the ETF.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,90 that the Proposals (SR-NYSEARCA-2023-70; SR-NYSEARCA-2024-31; SR-NASDAQ-2023- 045; SR-CboeBZX-2023-069; SR-CboeBZX-2023-070; SR-CboeBZX-2023-087; SRCboeBZX-2023-095; SR-CboeBZX-2024-018) be, and hereby are, approved on an accelerated basis. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.91 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Deputy Secretary

You can dispute the final decision, please tap on dispute and login @adorableraccoon.eth

for all you who have no shares and are salty: bring the rules of the market and polymarket's resolution to ANY SAT/GMAT verbal professor and see what they say. Hint: everyone will agree with polymarket, because it's basic reading comprehension

This is not final approval.

In a week or a month when they accept s1 it turns out etf will be accepted a second time or maybe after all these are 2 parts of one

Rule clarification didn't clarify rules, they proposed a resolution. That verbiage is biased and untrue. If you read the sec.pdf linked the word approved is only listed in it once, and it's about rule changes. Not the approval of the entire ETF process?

I think it should resolve to 50/50. Clearly, the market was ill-worded and the additional context should have been posted right after the discussion started. I admit that for people who don't know much about the listing process, it could be seen as approved, but from a regulatory perspective, it is clearly not.