Recent escalations in US-Cuba tensions, including Pentagon directives accelerating contingency planning for potential military operations and Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel's April 16 warning of possible US airstrikes or leadership targeting, have driven trader consensus to a closely contested 54.5% implied probability for no clash in 2026. Underlying factors include a US energy blockade exacerbating Cuba's fuel shortages, Havana's alleged dispatch of up to 5,000 fighters to aid Russia in Ukraine, and prior incidents like Cuban forces killing US-resident Cubans on a speedboat amid January's Venezuela operation that killed 32 Cuban officers. Balancing this are US military denials of active invasion rehearsals, closed-door diplomatic talks, and Washington's focus on Iran, maintaining uncertainty. A Trump order post-Iran resolution or Cuban provocation could tip toward yes; de-escalation signals or blockade relief might solidify no.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트$88,381 거래량
$88,381 거래량
$88,381 거래량
$88,381 거래량
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
마켓 개설일: Feb 25, 2026, 7:31 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Cuban military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Cuban Border Guard is considered part of the Cuban military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Recent escalations in US-Cuba tensions, including Pentagon directives accelerating contingency planning for potential military operations and Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel's April 16 warning of possible US airstrikes or leadership targeting, have driven trader consensus to a closely contested 54.5% implied probability for no clash in 2026. Underlying factors include a US energy blockade exacerbating Cuba's fuel shortages, Havana's alleged dispatch of up to 5,000 fighters to aid Russia in Ukraine, and prior incidents like Cuban forces killing US-resident Cubans on a speedboat amid January's Venezuela operation that killed 32 Cuban officers. Balancing this are US military denials of active invasion rehearsals, closed-door diplomatic talks, and Washington's focus on Iran, maintaining uncertainty. A Trump order post-Iran resolution or Cuban provocation could tip toward yes; de-escalation signals or blockade relief might solidify no.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
자주 묻는 질문