**Abelardo de la Espriella holds a trader edge (56.5%) over Iván Cepeda Castro (45.5%) for most votes from Bogotá in the June 21 runoff, reflecting the right-wing outsider’s stronger national momentum after leading the first round 43.7%–40.9%.** Bogotá favored Cepeda in the first round (41.7%–37.7%), consistent with its urban, center-left tilt, yet de la Espriella’s gains among centrist and evangelical voters, plus endorsement momentum from third-place finisher Paloma Valencia, have shifted implied probabilities. The race remains tight because both candidates are consolidating polarized bases in a high-turnout environment, with undecided centrist blocs and coalition signals from figures like Sergio Fajardo still fluid. Recent campaign adjustments—Cepeda moderating on constitutional assembly proposals to court moderates, and de la Espriella emphasizing security and economic rupture—keep Bogotá competitive. Late developments such as Bogotá-specific polling shifts, turnout patterns in the capital, or last-minute endorsements before June 21 could widen the gap.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoSegunda vuelta de las elecciones presidenciales en Colombia: la mayoría de los votos son de Bogotá
$492,657 Vol.
$492,657 Vol.

Iván Cepeda Castro
100%

Abelardo de la Espriella
<1%
$492,657 Vol.
$492,657 Vol.

Iván Cepeda Castro
100%

Abelardo de la Espriella
<1%
This market will resolve according to the listed candidate who receives the most votes from the Bogotá Capital District in the second round of this election.
The named candidates will be primarily ranked by the number of valid votes received in the specified election. If two or more candidates are tied on valid votes, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the candidates' last names. This market will resolve to the candidate that occupies the highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
If the results of the second round of the Colombian presidential election are not known by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
This market will resolve based on the election results, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by Colombia's National Civil Registry (Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil) (https://registraduria.gov.co).
Mercado abierto: Jun 5, 2026, 3:22 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the listed candidate who receives the most votes from the Bogotá Capital District in the second round of this election.
The named candidates will be primarily ranked by the number of valid votes received in the specified election. If two or more candidates are tied on valid votes, ties will be broken by alphabetical order of the candidates' last names. This market will resolve to the candidate that occupies the highest finishing position after applying this ranking.
If the results of the second round of the Colombian presidential election are not known by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
This market will resolve based on the election results, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by Colombia's National Civil Registry (Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil) (https://registraduria.gov.co).
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...**Abelardo de la Espriella holds a trader edge (56.5%) over Iván Cepeda Castro (45.5%) for most votes from Bogotá in the June 21 runoff, reflecting the right-wing outsider’s stronger national momentum after leading the first round 43.7%–40.9%.** Bogotá favored Cepeda in the first round (41.7%–37.7%), consistent with its urban, center-left tilt, yet de la Espriella’s gains among centrist and evangelical voters, plus endorsement momentum from third-place finisher Paloma Valencia, have shifted implied probabilities. The race remains tight because both candidates are consolidating polarized bases in a high-turnout environment, with undecided centrist blocs and coalition signals from figures like Sergio Fajardo still fluid. Recent campaign adjustments—Cepeda moderating on constitutional assembly proposals to court moderates, and de la Espriella emphasizing security and economic rupture—keep Bogotá competitive. Late developments such as Bogotá-specific polling shifts, turnout patterns in the capital, or last-minute endorsements before June 21 could widen the gap.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes