Market icon

Critical Discord Incident by April 30?

Market icon

Critical Discord Incident by April 30?

Apr 30

Apr 30

49% chance
Polymarket
NEW
49% chance
Polymarket
NEW
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Discord experiences any incident classified as Critical (red) by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Qualifying incidents may include outages and other issues that Discord classifies as Critical. Revisions to the impact classification of any such incident will be considered as long as those revisions are published within this market’s timeframe. However, revisions of a previously published incident impact classification of Critical (red) to another classification will not disqualify an incident from counting. If an incident is ongoing at this market’s resolution time, the market may remain open until that incident receives an official impact classification, and it will resolve based on the first such classification published, regardless of subsequent revisions or corrections. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from Discord (for example, on discordstatus.com or discordstatus.com/history); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used. Note: Discord impact classifications of Major (orange) and Critical (red) are not equivalent.Traders' slim 51% consensus on "No" for a critical Discord incident by April 30 reflects the platform's pattern of frequent but rapidly resolved outages, exemplified by the March 25 voice connectivity failure that spiked Downdetector reports to over 20,000 users yet was fixed within three hours via networking fixes. No ongoing vulnerabilities, data breaches, or regulatory probes—unlike the October 2025 third-party vendor compromise—bolster stability expectations, though Discord's history of disruptions in presence, DMs, and voice keeps "Yes" viable at 49%. Sentiment could pivot on unannounced security patches, major events like developer conferences, or a prolonged outage exceeding historical norms, with the status page as the key resolution oracle.

Traders' slim 51% consensus on "No" for a critical Discord incident by April 30 reflects the platform's pattern of frequent but rapidly resolved outages, exemplified by the March 25 voice connectivity failure that spiked Downdetector reports to over 20,000 users yet was fixed within three hours via networking fixes. No ongoing vulnerabilities, data breaches, or regulatory probes—unlike the October 2025 third-party vendor compromise—bolster stability expectations, though Discord's history of disruptions in presence, DMs, and voice keeps "Yes" viable at 49%. Sentiment could pivot on unannounced security patches, major events like developer conferences, or a prolonged outage exceeding historical norms, with the status page as the key resolution oracle.

Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Discord experiences any incident classified as Critical (red) by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Qualifying incidents may include outages and other issues that Discord classifies as Critical. Revisions to the impact classification of any such incident will be considered as long as those revisions are published within this market’s timeframe. However, revisions of a previously published incident impact classification of Critical (red) to another classification will not disqualify an incident from counting. If an incident is ongoing at this market’s resolution time, the market may remain open until that incident receives an official impact classification, and it will resolve based on the first such classification published, regardless of subsequent revisions or corrections. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from Discord (for example, on discordstatus.com or discordstatus.com/history); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used. Note: Discord impact classifications of Major (orange) and Critical (red) are not equivalent.Traders' slim 51% consensus on "No" for a critical Discord incident by April 30 reflects the platform's pattern of frequent but rapidly resolved outages, exemplified by the March 25 voice connectivity failure that spiked Downdetector reports to over 20,000 users yet was fixed within three hours via networking fixes. No ongoing vulnerabilities, data breaches, or regulatory probes—unlike the October 2025 third-party vendor compromise—bolster stability expectations, though Discord's history of disruptions in presence, DMs, and voice keeps "Yes" viable at 49%. Sentiment could pivot on unannounced security patches, major events like developer conferences, or a prolonged outage exceeding historical norms, with the status page as the key resolution oracle.

Traders' slim 51% consensus on "No" for a critical Discord incident by April 30 reflects the platform's pattern of frequent but rapidly resolved outages, exemplified by the March 25 voice connectivity failure that spiked Downdetector reports to over 20,000 users yet was fixed within three hours via networking fixes. No ongoing vulnerabilities, data breaches, or regulatory probes—unlike the October 2025 third-party vendor compromise—bolster stability expectations, though Discord's history of disruptions in presence, DMs, and voice keeps "Yes" viable at 49%. Sentiment could pivot on unannounced security patches, major events like developer conferences, or a prolonged outage exceeding historical norms, with the status page as the key resolution oracle.

Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour

Méfiez-vous des liens externes.

Questions fréquentes

« Critical Discord Incident by April 30? » est un marché de prédiction sur Polymarket où les traders achètent et vendent des parts « Oui » ou « Non » selon qu'ils estiment que cet événement se produira ou non. La probabilité actuelle selon la communauté est de 49% pour « Yes ». Par exemple, si « Oui » est coté à 49¢, le marché attribue collectivement une probabilité de 49% que cet événement se produise. Ces cotes changent en permanence à mesure que les traders réagissent aux nouveaux développements et informations. Les parts du résultat correct sont échangeables contre $1 chacune lors de la résolution du marché.

« Critical Discord Incident by April 30? » est un marché nouvellement créé sur Polymarket, lancé le Mar 27, 2026. En tant que marché récent, c'est votre opportunité d'être parmi les premiers traders à définir les cotes et établir les premiers signaux de prix du marché. Vous pouvez également ajouter cette page à vos favoris pour suivre le volume et l'activité de trading au fil du temps.

Pour trader sur « Critical Discord Incident by April 30? », choisissez simplement si vous pensez que la réponse est « Oui » ou « Non ». Chaque côté a un prix actuel qui reflète la probabilité implicite du marché. Entrez votre montant et cliquez sur « Trader ». Si vous achetez des parts « Oui » et que le résultat se résout comme « Oui », chaque part rapporte $1. S'il se résout comme « Non », vos parts « Oui » rapportent $0. Vous pouvez également vendre vos parts à tout moment avant la résolution pour sécuriser un gain ou limiter une perte.

La probabilité actuelle pour « Critical Discord Incident by April 30? » est de 49% pour « Yes ». Cela signifie que la communauté Polymarket estime actuellement qu'il y a une probabilité de 49% que cet événement se produise. Ces cotes sont mises à jour en temps réel sur la base de transactions réelles, fournissant un signal continuellement actualisé de ce que le marché attend.

Les règles de résolution de « Critical Discord Incident by April 30? » définissent exactement ce qui doit se produire pour que chaque résultat soit déclaré gagnant, y compris les sources de données officielles utilisées pour déterminer le résultat. Vous pouvez consulter les critères de résolution complets dans la section « Règles » sur cette page au-dessus des commentaires. Nous recommandons de lire attentivement les règles avant de trader, car elles précisent les conditions exactes, les cas particuliers et les sources.