Tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan persist over Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants operating from Afghan soil, but traders see scant evidence of imminent military action targeting Kabul by March 31, reflected in the 79% "No" odds. Recent Pakistani airstrikes in late December 2024 and January 2025 remained confined to border regions like Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, avoiding the capital amid Taliban vows of retaliation without follow-through. Diplomatic channels stay active, with intelligence-sharing talks and Taliban pledges to curb TTP activity, reducing escalation risks. No official Pakistani statements signal Kabul-specific operations, aligning with historical patterns of limited cross-border responses rather than full assaults on urban centers.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
市场开放时间: Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan persist over Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants operating from Afghan soil, but traders see scant evidence of imminent military action targeting Kabul by March 31, reflected in the 79% "No" odds. Recent Pakistani airstrikes in late December 2024 and January 2025 remained confined to border regions like Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, avoiding the capital amid Taliban vows of retaliation without follow-through. Diplomatic channels stay active, with intelligence-sharing talks and Taliban pledges to curb TTP activity, reducing escalation risks. No official Pakistani statements signal Kabul-specific operations, aligning with historical patterns of limited cross-border responses rather than full assaults on urban centers.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题