Market icon
体育·NCAA

2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军

Market icon
体育·NCAA

2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军

密歇根 35%

亚利桑那 33.6%

伊利诺伊 17.3%

康涅狄格 13.4%

Polymarket

$23,432,881 交易量

密歇根 35%

亚利桑那 33.6%

伊利诺伊 17.3%

康涅狄格 13.4%

Polymarket

$23,432,881 交易量

密歇根

$1,220,374 交易量

35%

亚利桑那

$1,333,384 交易量

34%

伊利诺伊

$1,461,934 交易量

17%

康涅狄格

$2,702,811 交易量

13%

This market will resolve according to the team that wins the 2026 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. If it is impossible for a team to win the 2026 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament according to the rules of the competition (i.e. they are eliminated) , the corresponding market will immediately resolve to “No”. If for any reason no winner is declared by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other". The resolution source for this market will be information from the NCAA.With the 2026 NCAA Tournament Final Four set featuring Michigan, Arizona, Illinois, and UConn after gripping Elite Eight outcomes, trader consensus shows a nail-biter atop the market at 34.5% for Michigan and 33.6% for Arizona, reflecting evenly matched strengths and tournament momentum. UConn's dramatic buzzer-beater by Braylon Mullins over top-seed Duke with 0.4 seconds left propelled their comeback surge, while Illinois dominated Iowa 71-59 via frontcourt control for their first Final Four since 2005; Arizona exploded for a 79-64 rout of Purdue behind second-half dominance, and Michigan continued overwhelming foes like Tennessee. Balanced rosters, clutch performances, and semifinal paths lacking a clear mismatch keep implied probabilities bunched, highlighting March Madness' inherent volatility.

With the 2026 NCAA Tournament Final Four set featuring Michigan, Arizona, Illinois, and UConn after gripping Elite Eight outcomes, trader consensus shows a nail-biter atop the market at 34.5% for Michigan and 33.6% for Arizona, reflecting evenly matched strengths and tournament momentum. UConn's dramatic buzzer-beater by Braylon Mullins over top-seed Duke with 0.4 seconds left propelled their comeback surge, while Illinois dominated Iowa 71-59 via frontcourt control for their first Final Four since 2005; Arizona exploded for a 79-64 rout of Purdue behind second-half dominance, and Michigan continued overwhelming foes like Tennessee. Balanced rosters, clutch performances, and semifinal paths lacking a clear mismatch keep implied probabilities bunched, highlighting March Madness' inherent volatility.

基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
This market will resolve according to the team that wins the 2026 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. If it is impossible for a team to win the 2026 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament according to the rules of the competition (i.e. they are eliminated) , the corresponding market will immediately resolve to “No”. If for any reason no winner is declared by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other". The resolution source for this market will be information from the NCAA.With the 2026 NCAA Tournament Final Four set featuring Michigan, Arizona, Illinois, and UConn after gripping Elite Eight outcomes, trader consensus shows a nail-biter atop the market at 34.5% for Michigan and 33.6% for Arizona, reflecting evenly matched strengths and tournament momentum. UConn's dramatic buzzer-beater by Braylon Mullins over top-seed Duke with 0.4 seconds left propelled their comeback surge, while Illinois dominated Iowa 71-59 via frontcourt control for their first Final Four since 2005; Arizona exploded for a 79-64 rout of Purdue behind second-half dominance, and Michigan continued overwhelming foes like Tennessee. Balanced rosters, clutch performances, and semifinal paths lacking a clear mismatch keep implied probabilities bunched, highlighting March Madness' inherent volatility.

With the 2026 NCAA Tournament Final Four set featuring Michigan, Arizona, Illinois, and UConn after gripping Elite Eight outcomes, trader consensus shows a nail-biter atop the market at 34.5% for Michigan and 33.6% for Arizona, reflecting evenly matched strengths and tournament momentum. UConn's dramatic buzzer-beater by Braylon Mullins over top-seed Duke with 0.4 seconds left propelled their comeback surge, while Illinois dominated Iowa 71-59 via frontcourt control for their first Final Four since 2005; Arizona exploded for a 79-64 rout of Purdue behind second-half dominance, and Michigan continued overwhelming foes like Tennessee. Balanced rosters, clutch performances, and semifinal paths lacking a clear mismatch keep implied probabilities bunched, highlighting March Madness' inherent volatility.

基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于

警惕外部链接哦。

常见问题

"2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军"是 Polymarket 上一个拥有 70+ 个可能结果的预测市场，交易者根据自己的判断买卖份额。当前领先结果为"密歇根"，概率为 35%，其次是"亚利桑那"，概率为 34%。价格反映社区的实时概率。例如，价格为 35¢ 的份额意味着市场集体认为该结果的概率为 35%。这些赔率会随着交易者的反应而不断变化。正确结果的份额在市场结算时可兑换为每份 $1。

截至目前，"2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军"已产生 $23.4 million 的总交易量（自Oct 31, 2025市场上线以来）。这一活跃度反映了 Polymarket 社区的高度参与，并确保当前赔率由广泛的市场参与者共同形成。你可以直接在本页追踪实时价格变动并交易任何结果。

要在"2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军"上交易，浏览本页上列出的 70+ 个可用结果。每个结果显示一个代表市场隐含概率的当前价格。要建仓，选择你认为最可能的结果，选择"是"支持或"否"反对，输入金额并点击"交易"。如果你选择的结果在市场结算时正确，你的"是"份额每份支付 $1。如果不正确，支付 $0。你也可以在结算前随时卖出份额。

"2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军"的当前领先者是"密歇根"，概率为 35%，意味着市场对该结果的概率评估为 35%。紧随其后的结果是"亚利桑那"，概率为 34%。这些赔率随着交易者买卖份额而实时更新。请经常回来查看或将本页加入书签。

"2026年NCAA锦标赛冠军"的结算规则明确定义了每个结果被宣布为获胜者所需满足的条件——包括用于确定结果的官方数据来源。你可以在本页评论上方的"规则"部分查看完整的结算标准。我们建议在交易前仔细阅读规则，因为它们规定了精确的条件、特殊情况和数据来源。