Amid escalating US-Cuba tensions fueled by President Trump's May 1 remarks teasing a swift "takeover" of Cuba and subsequent executive orders expanding sanctions on Havana's military-run GAESA conglomerate and foreign energy firms aiding its oil imports, traders imply a 37% probability of US military action such as airstrikes or invasion by December 31. This follows Pentagon directives in mid-April to accelerate contingency planning for potential operations, amid Cuba's deepening energy crisis triggered by US interdiction of Venezuelan oil tankers after Nicolás Maduro's January capture. Cuban officials condemned the threats as "dangerous" on May 6, warning of a "bloodbath," while US sources emphasized no imminent intervention, prioritizing diplomacy alongside offers of Starlink access for political reforms. A failed congressional War Powers Resolution is viewed by some as tacit approval, though rapid de-escalation remains possible before year-end.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoAção militar dos EUA contra Cuba por...?
Ação militar dos EUA contra Cuba por...?
$3,264,701 Vol.
31 dez 2026
31 de dezembro
37%
$3,264,701 Vol.
31 de dezembro
$1,085,597 Vol.
37%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a US-initiated drone, missile, or air strike on the soil of Cuba is announced or credibly reported to have occurred by the listed date ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.Amid escalating US-Cuba tensions fueled by President Trump's May 1 remarks teasing a swift "takeover" of Cuba and subsequent executive orders expanding sanctions on Havana's military-run GAESA conglomerate and foreign energy firms aiding its oil imports, traders imply a 37% probability of US military action such as airstrikes or invasion by December 31. This follows Pentagon directives in mid-April to accelerate contingency planning for potential operations, amid Cuba's deepening energy crisis triggered by US interdiction of Venezuelan oil tankers after Nicolás Maduro's January capture. Cuban officials condemned the threats as "dangerous" on May 6, warning of a "bloodbath," while US sources emphasized no imminent intervention, prioritizing diplomacy alongside offers of Starlink access for political reforms. A failed congressional War Powers Resolution is viewed by some as tacit approval, though rapid de-escalation remains possible before year-end.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a US-initiated drone, missile, or air strike on the soil of Cuba is announced or credibly reported to have occurred by the listed date ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Mercado Aberto: Jan 4, 2026, 3:08 PM ET
Volume
$3,264,701Data de Término
31 dez 2026Mercado Aberto
Jan 4, 2026, 3:08 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if a US-initiated drone, missile, or air strike on the soil of Cuba is announced or credibly reported to have occurred by the listed date ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.Amid escalating US-Cuba tensions fueled by President Trump's May 1 remarks teasing a swift "takeover" of Cuba and subsequent executive orders expanding sanctions on Havana's military-run GAESA conglomerate and foreign energy firms aiding its oil imports, traders imply a 37% probability of US military action such as airstrikes or invasion by December 31. This follows Pentagon directives in mid-April to accelerate contingency planning for potential operations, amid Cuba's deepening energy crisis triggered by US interdiction of Venezuelan oil tankers after Nicolás Maduro's January capture. Cuban officials condemned the threats as "dangerous" on May 6, warning of a "bloodbath," while US sources emphasized no imminent intervention, prioritizing diplomacy alongside offers of Starlink access for political reforms. A failed congressional War Powers Resolution is viewed by some as tacit approval, though rapid de-escalation remains possible before year-end.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a US-initiated drone, missile, or air strike on the soil of Cuba is announced or credibly reported to have occurred by the listed date ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Volume
$3,264,701Data de Término
31 dez 2026Mercado Aberto
Jan 4, 2026, 3:08 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Amid escalating US-Cuba tensions fueled by President Trump's May 1 remarks teasing a swift "takeover" of Cuba and subsequent executive orders expanding sanctions on Havana's military-run GAESA conglomerate and foreign energy firms aiding its oil imports, traders imply a 37% probability of US military action such as airstrikes or invasion by December 31. This follows Pentagon directives in mid-April to accelerate contingency planning for potential operations, amid Cuba's deepening energy crisis triggered by US interdiction of Venezuelan oil tankers after Nicolás Maduro's January capture. Cuban officials condemned the threats as "dangerous" on May 6, warning of a "bloodbath," while US sources emphasized no imminent intervention, prioritizing diplomacy alongside offers of Starlink access for political reforms. A failed congressional War Powers Resolution is viewed by some as tacit approval, though rapid de-escalation remains possible before year-end.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions