Trader consensus clusters tightly around Duke (20.5%), Michigan (18.5%), and Arizona (17.8%) for the 2026 NCAA Tournament due to their nation's top three 2025 recruiting classes, headlined by Duke's Cooper Flagg and Khaman Maluach, Michigan's elite haul under new coach Dusty May, and Arizona's balanced additions complementing returners like K.J. Lewis. The transfer portal's parity—bolstering Florida and Houston—amplifies uncertainty, as one-and-done freshmen and midseason momentum shifts historically fuel upsets. With the 2025-26 season looming, traders weigh coaching stability, non-conference strength, and injury risks, reflecting college hoops' volatility where top seeds falter 20-30% of the time in recent March Madness.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · AtualizadoDuke 21%
Michigan 19%
Arizona 17.3%
Flórida 9.6%
$11,042,382 Vol.
$11,042,382 Vol.
Duke
21%
Michigan
19%
Arizona
17%
Flórida
10%
Houston
8%
Iowa State
5%
Purdue
4%
Illinois
3%
Connecticut
3%
Michigan State
2%
Arkansas
2%
Vanderbilt
2%
Gonzaga
1%
Virgínia
1%
St. John's
1%
Kansas
1%
Louisville
1%
Wisconsin
1%
Alabama
1%
UCLA
1%
Tennessee
1%
Kentucky
<1%
BYU
<1%
Texas Tech
<1%
Carolina do Norte
<1%
Nebraska
<1%
St. Mary's
<1%
Miami (FL)
<1%
Ohio State
<1%
Villanova
<1%
Missouri
<1%
Iowa
<1%
Texas A&M
<1%
Geórgia
<1%
Saint Louis
<1%
Clemson
<1%
TCU
<1%
Santa Clara
<1%
UCF
<1%
Sul da Flórida
<1%
Miami (OH)
<1%
SMU
<1%
Northern Iowa
<1%
Dakota do Norte State
<1%
LIU
<1%
High Point
<1%
Kennesaw State
<1%
Prairie View A&M
<1%
Troy
<1%
Idaho
<1%
Hofstra
<1%
Akron
<1%
McNeese
<1%
VCU
<1%
Texas
<1%
Siena
<1%
Cal Baptist
<1%
Furman
<1%
Utah State
<1%
Havaí
<1%
Queens
<1%
Lehigh
<1%
Penn
<1%
Tennessee State
<1%
Howard
<1%
Wright State
<1%
Duke 21%
Michigan 19%
Arizona 17.3%
Flórida 9.6%
$11,042,382 Vol.
$11,042,382 Vol.
Duke
21%
Michigan
19%
Arizona
17%
Flórida
10%
Houston
8%
Iowa State
5%
Purdue
4%
Illinois
3%
Connecticut
3%
Michigan State
2%
Arkansas
2%
Vanderbilt
2%
Gonzaga
1%
Virgínia
1%
St. John's
1%
Kansas
1%
Louisville
1%
Wisconsin
1%
Alabama
1%
UCLA
1%
Tennessee
1%
Kentucky
<1%
BYU
<1%
Texas Tech
<1%
Carolina do Norte
<1%
Nebraska
<1%
St. Mary's
<1%
Miami (FL)
<1%
Ohio State
<1%
Villanova
<1%
Missouri
<1%
Iowa
<1%
Texas A&M
<1%
Geórgia
<1%
Saint Louis
<1%
Clemson
<1%
TCU
<1%
Santa Clara
<1%
UCF
<1%
Sul da Flórida
<1%
Miami (OH)
<1%
SMU
<1%
Northern Iowa
<1%
Dakota do Norte State
<1%
LIU
<1%
High Point
<1%
Kennesaw State
<1%
Prairie View A&M
<1%
Troy
<1%
Idaho
<1%
Hofstra
<1%
Akron
<1%
McNeese
<1%
VCU
<1%
Texas
<1%
Siena
<1%
Cal Baptist
<1%
Furman
<1%
Utah State
<1%
Havaí
<1%
Queens
<1%
Lehigh
<1%
Penn
<1%
Tennessee State
<1%
Howard
<1%
Wright State
<1%
If it is impossible for a team to win the 2026 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament according to the rules of the competition (i.e. they are eliminated) , the corresponding market will immediately resolve to “No”.
If for any reason no winner is declared by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
The resolution source for this market will be information from the NCAA.
Mercado Aberto: Oct 31, 2025, 7:31 PM ET
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Trader consensus clusters tightly around Duke (20.5%), Michigan (18.5%), and Arizona (17.8%) for the 2026 NCAA Tournament due to their nation's top three 2025 recruiting classes, headlined by Duke's Cooper Flagg and Khaman Maluach, Michigan's elite haul under new coach Dusty May, and Arizona's balanced additions complementing returners like K.J. Lewis. The transfer portal's parity—bolstering Florida and Houston—amplifies uncertainty, as one-and-done freshmen and midseason momentum shifts historically fuel upsets. With the 2025-26 season looming, traders weigh coaching stability, non-conference strength, and injury risks, reflecting college hoops' volatility where top seeds falter 20-30% of the time in recent March Madness.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions