Anthropic’s recent Claude Fable 5.1 release on September 1 and strong showings across Code Arena WebDev leaderboards, including a 1758 ELO score just behind OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra, have solidified trader consensus around its second-place positioning by month-end. The model’s 1M-token context, high SWE-bench and agentic coding results, and consistent outperformance versus open-weight and other proprietary labs create a durable edge in real-user web app building tasks. With only weeks remaining and no announced major updates from competitors, market-implied odds reflect limited scope for a late surge by OpenAI or challengers like Alibaba or Moonshot. Traders are weighting Anthropic’s execution momentum and benchmark stability heavily in this narrow window.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · ZaktualizowanoSecond-best Code Arena WebDev AI Lab end of September?
Anthropic 82.4%
OpenAI 15.5%
Alibaba 1.8%
Moonshot 1.1%
$70,678 Wol.
$70,678 Wol.

Anthropic
82%

OpenAI
16%

Alibaba
2%

Moonshot
1%

SpaceXAI
1%

Tencent
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

<1%

Meta
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

MiniMax
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Thinky
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Mistral
<1%
Anthropic 82.4%
OpenAI 15.5%
Alibaba 1.8%
Moonshot 1.1%
$70,678 Wol.
$70,678 Wol.

Anthropic
82%

OpenAI
16%

Alibaba
2%

Moonshot
1%

SpaceXAI
1%

Tencent
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

<1%

Meta
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

MiniMax
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Thinky
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Mistral
<1%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Rynek otwarty: Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ET
Źródło rozstrzygnięcia
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsRozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Źródło rozstrzygnięcia
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsRozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic’s recent Claude Fable 5.1 release on September 1 and strong showings across Code Arena WebDev leaderboards, including a 1758 ELO score just behind OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra, have solidified trader consensus around its second-place positioning by month-end. The model’s 1M-token context, high SWE-bench and agentic coding results, and consistent outperformance versus open-weight and other proprietary labs create a durable edge in real-user web app building tasks. With only weeks remaining and no announced major updates from competitors, market-implied odds reflect limited scope for a late surge by OpenAI or challengers like Alibaba or Moonshot. Traders are weighting Anthropic’s execution momentum and benchmark stability heavily in this narrow window.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania