Pakistan-Afghanistan border tensions have driven recent cross-border strikes, but traders see low odds of Pakistani military action targeting Kabul by March 31, with "No" shares at 71%. Pakistan's March 18 airstrikes hit Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) hideouts in Khost and Paktika provinces, prompting Taliban condemnation as sovereignty violations without Kabul-specific threats or retaliation. Diplomatic channels remain open, with Pakistan's military denying further escalations and both sides prioritizing economic stability amid refugee returns and trade disputes at Torkham crossing. Absent mobilization signals or official vows against the Afghan capital, market consensus reflects restraint over full confrontation.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jourPakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
Pakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Marché ouvert : Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Pakistan-Afghanistan border tensions have driven recent cross-border strikes, but traders see low odds of Pakistani military action targeting Kabul by March 31, with "No" shares at 71%. Pakistan's March 18 airstrikes hit Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) hideouts in Khost and Paktika provinces, prompting Taliban condemnation as sovereignty violations without Kabul-specific threats or retaliation. Diplomatic channels remain open, with Pakistan's military denying further escalations and both sides prioritizing economic stability amid refugee returns and trade disputes at Torkham crossing. Absent mobilization signals or official vows against the Afghan capital, market consensus reflects restraint over full confrontation.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes