Duke, Michigan, and Arizona lead trader consensus for the 2026 NCAA Tournament at 19.5%, 18.5%, and 17.5%, respectively, driven by their elite 2025 recruiting classes—Duke tops rankings with five-star wings Kon Knueppel and Isaiah Evans, Michigan bolsters via coach Dusty May's transfer portal hauls including Nolan Essengue, and Arizona stacks size with top-10 commits. This tight bunching underscores college hoops parity from aggressive NIL-fueled roster builds, one-and-done NBA pipelines, and a marathon season vulnerable to injuries, upsets, and portal flux, keeping implied probabilities neck-and-neck among blue-blood rebuilds while fading recent champs like UConn amid heavy attrition.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jourDuke 20%
Michigan 19%
Arizona 17.3%
Floride 9.8%
$12,227,305 Vol.
$12,227,305 Vol.
Duke
20%
Michigan
19%
Arizona
17%
Floride
10%
Houston
8%
Iowa State
5%
Purdue
4%
Illinois
3%
Connecticut
3%
Arkansas
2%
Michigan State
2%
Gonzaga
1%
Saint John's
1%
Vanderbilt
1%
Virginie
1%
Kansas
1%
Wisconsin
1%
UCLA
1%
Louisville
1%
Tennessee
1%
Alabama
1%
Nebraska
1%
Kentucky
<1%
BYU
<1%
Texas Tech
<1%
Caroline du Nord
<1%
St. Mary's
<1%
Miami (FL)
<1%
Ohio State
<1%
Missouri
<1%
Villanova
<1%
Iowa
<1%
Texas A&M
<1%
Géorgie
<1%
Saint Louis
<1%
Clemson
<1%
TCU
<1%
Santa Clara
<1%
UCF
<1%
South Florida
<1%
Miami (OH)
<1%
SMU
<1%
Northern Iowa
<1%
North Dakota State
<1%
LIU
<1%
High Point
<1%
Kennesaw State
<1%
Prairie View A&M
<1%
Troy
<1%
Idaho
<1%
Hofstra
<1%
Akron
<1%
McNeese
<1%
VCU
<1%
Texas
<1%
Siena
<1%
Cal Baptist
<1%
Furman
<1%
Utah State
<1%
Hawaï
<1%
Queens
<1%
Lehigh
<1%
Penn
<1%
Tennessee State
<1%
Howard
<1%
Wright State
<1%
Duke 20%
Michigan 19%
Arizona 17.3%
Floride 9.8%
$12,227,305 Vol.
$12,227,305 Vol.
Duke
20%
Michigan
19%
Arizona
17%
Floride
10%
Houston
8%
Iowa State
5%
Purdue
4%
Illinois
3%
Connecticut
3%
Arkansas
2%
Michigan State
2%
Gonzaga
1%
Saint John's
1%
Vanderbilt
1%
Virginie
1%
Kansas
1%
Wisconsin
1%
UCLA
1%
Louisville
1%
Tennessee
1%
Alabama
1%
Nebraska
1%
Kentucky
<1%
BYU
<1%
Texas Tech
<1%
Caroline du Nord
<1%
St. Mary's
<1%
Miami (FL)
<1%
Ohio State
<1%
Missouri
<1%
Villanova
<1%
Iowa
<1%
Texas A&M
<1%
Géorgie
<1%
Saint Louis
<1%
Clemson
<1%
TCU
<1%
Santa Clara
<1%
UCF
<1%
South Florida
<1%
Miami (OH)
<1%
SMU
<1%
Northern Iowa
<1%
North Dakota State
<1%
LIU
<1%
High Point
<1%
Kennesaw State
<1%
Prairie View A&M
<1%
Troy
<1%
Idaho
<1%
Hofstra
<1%
Akron
<1%
McNeese
<1%
VCU
<1%
Texas
<1%
Siena
<1%
Cal Baptist
<1%
Furman
<1%
Utah State
<1%
Hawaï
<1%
Queens
<1%
Lehigh
<1%
Penn
<1%
Tennessee State
<1%
Howard
<1%
Wright State
<1%
If it is impossible for a team to win the 2026 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament according to the rules of the competition (i.e. they are eliminated) , the corresponding market will immediately resolve to “No”.
If for any reason no winner is declared by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
The resolution source for this market will be information from the NCAA.
Marché ouvert : Oct 31, 2025, 7:31 PM ET
Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Resolver
0x2F5e3684c...Duke, Michigan, and Arizona lead trader consensus for the 2026 NCAA Tournament at 19.5%, 18.5%, and 17.5%, respectively, driven by their elite 2025 recruiting classes—Duke tops rankings with five-star wings Kon Knueppel and Isaiah Evans, Michigan bolsters via coach Dusty May's transfer portal hauls including Nolan Essengue, and Arizona stacks size with top-10 commits. This tight bunching underscores college hoops parity from aggressive NIL-fueled roster builds, one-and-done NBA pipelines, and a marathon season vulnerable to injuries, upsets, and portal flux, keeping implied probabilities neck-and-neck among blue-blood rebuilds while fading recent champs like UConn amid heavy attrition.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes