Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$1,068,577 交易量
2026-08-01
8月1日
是
8月2日
否
8月3日
是
8月4日
是
8月5日
是
8月6日
是
8月7日
是
8月8日
是
8月9日
是
8月10日
是
8月11日
否
8月12日
是
8月13日
是
8月14日
是
8月15日
是
8月16日
是
8月17日
是
8月18日
是
8月19日
是
8月20日
是
8月21日
是
8月22日
是
8月23日
否
8月24日
是
8月25日
是
8月26日
是
8月27日
是
8月28日
是
8月29日
是
8月30日
是
8月31日
是
$1,068,577 交易量
8月1日
$1,460 交易量
是
8月2日
$3,874 交易量
否
8月3日
$2,055 交易量
是
8月4日
$3,612 交易量
是
8月5日
$5,490 交易量
是
8月6日
$2,384 交易量
是
8月7日
$2,710 交易量
是
8月8日
$3,278 交易量
是
8月9日
$1,906 交易量
是
8月10日
$1,595 交易量
是
8月11日
$10,863 交易量
否
8月12日
$4,011 交易量
是
8月13日
$87,209 交易量
是
8月14日
$3,173 交易量
是
8月15日
$6,650 交易量
是
8月16日
$2,155 交易量
是
8月17日
$6,918 交易量
是
8月18日
$6,535 交易量
是
8月19日
$5,160 交易量
是
8月20日
$3,184 交易量
是
8月21日
$3,130 交易量
是
8月22日
$7,075 交易量
是
8月23日
$826,048 交易量
否
8月24日
$5,562 交易量
是
8月25日
$8,578 交易量
是
8月26日
$8,064 交易量
是
8月27日
$8,531 交易量
是
8月28日
$10,404 交易量
是
8月29日
$13,881 交易量
是
8月30日
$6,082 交易量
是
8月31日
$7,002 交易量
是
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ET
交易量
$1,068,577结束日期
2026-09-01市场开放时间
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ET已提议结果: 是
无争议
最终结果: 是
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$1,068,577结束日期
2026-09-01市场开放时间
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ET已提议结果: 是
无争议
最终结果: 是
Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题