Recent polling and rating updates from forecasters like Sabato’s Crystal Ball have shifted Alaska and the Ohio special election into toss-up territory while keeping Texas, Iowa, Maine, and Michigan among the most competitive contests, driven by narrow margins between established nominees in states with mixed partisan fundamentals. In Texas, Ken Paxton’s primary victory over incumbent John Cornyn has produced head-to-head surveys showing James Talarico within a few points. Ohio’s special features Jon Husted against Sherrod Brown in a state that has trended Republican yet remains sensitive to candidate strength. Iowa’s open seat pits Ashley Hinson against Josh Turek with early polls reflecting single-digit gaps, while Alaska’s Dan Sullivan–Mary Peltola matchup and Maine’s Susan Collins reelection bid similarly feature challengers who have narrowed historical Republican edges. Michigan’s open Democratic seat adds another variable. With no dominant frontrunner across these races, modest shifts in turnout, late advertising, or national conditions could reorder the ordering before November 3.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于Texas 20%
Ohio (Special) 17.1%
Iowa 16.9%
Maine 15%
$27,160 交易量
$27,160 交易量
Texas
20%
Ohio (Special)
17%
Iowa
17%
Maine
15%
Alaska
12%
Michigan
9%
Nebraska
6%
New Mexico
3%
Florida (Special)
3%
Virginia
2%
New Hampshire
2%
North Carolina
2%
Montana
2%
Colorado
2%
Georgia
2%
Minnesota
1%
Texas 20%
Ohio (Special) 17.1%
Iowa 16.9%
Maine 15%
$27,160 交易量
$27,160 交易量
Texas
20%
Ohio (Special)
17%
Iowa
17%
Maine
15%
Alaska
12%
Michigan
9%
Nebraska
6%
New Mexico
3%
Florida (Special)
3%
Virginia
2%
New Hampshire
2%
North Carolina
2%
Montana
2%
Colorado
2%
Georgia
2%
Minnesota
1%
This market will resolve according to the US Senate race which has the smallest margin of victory.
For the purpose of this market, the “margin of victory” is defined as the absolute difference between the percentages of valid votes received by the first- and second-place candidates. Percentages of the valid votes received by each candidate will be determined by dividing the total number of valid votes each of the top two candidates receives by the sum of all valid votes cast in the election.
For elections that include runoffs, ranked-choice, or other multi-round elections, the relevant margin of victory will be that of the round in which the winner is determined.
If two state margins of victory are identical, this market will resolve to the tied state whose last name comes first alphabetically.
This market will consider the results of all Senate elections, including special elections, that are scheduled to be held in November, 2026, by October 31, 2026, including the results of runoff elections held after November, 2026.
The resolution source for this market will be a compilation of all of the relevant state election authorities responsible for certifying statewide elections, however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市场开放时间: Jun 26, 2026, 3:52 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the US Senate race which has the smallest margin of victory.
For the purpose of this market, the “margin of victory” is defined as the absolute difference between the percentages of valid votes received by the first- and second-place candidates. Percentages of the valid votes received by each candidate will be determined by dividing the total number of valid votes each of the top two candidates receives by the sum of all valid votes cast in the election.
For elections that include runoffs, ranked-choice, or other multi-round elections, the relevant margin of victory will be that of the round in which the winner is determined.
If two state margins of victory are identical, this market will resolve to the tied state whose last name comes first alphabetically.
This market will consider the results of all Senate elections, including special elections, that are scheduled to be held in November, 2026, by October 31, 2026, including the results of runoff elections held after November, 2026.
The resolution source for this market will be a compilation of all of the relevant state election authorities responsible for certifying statewide elections, however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Recent polling and rating updates from forecasters like Sabato’s Crystal Ball have shifted Alaska and the Ohio special election into toss-up territory while keeping Texas, Iowa, Maine, and Michigan among the most competitive contests, driven by narrow margins between established nominees in states with mixed partisan fundamentals. In Texas, Ken Paxton’s primary victory over incumbent John Cornyn has produced head-to-head surveys showing James Talarico within a few points. Ohio’s special features Jon Husted against Sherrod Brown in a state that has trended Republican yet remains sensitive to candidate strength. Iowa’s open seat pits Ashley Hinson against Josh Turek with early polls reflecting single-digit gaps, while Alaska’s Dan Sullivan–Mary Peltola matchup and Maine’s Susan Collins reelection bid similarly feature challengers who have narrowed historical Republican edges. Michigan’s open Democratic seat adds another variable. With no dominant frontrunner across these races, modest shifts in turnout, late advertising, or national conditions could reorder the ordering before November 3.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于


警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题