President Donald Trump's longstanding pattern of public name-calling via Truth Social and speeches continues to shape trader consensus in this market, with recent examples including his April 22 attack on Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as "low IQ," sharp rebukes of MAGA influencers like Tucker Carlson opposing his Iran policy as "losers" and "stupid," and calls for Jimmy Kimmel's firing over a late-night segment three days ago. These followed his April 12 insults against Pope Leo XIV as "too liberal and weak on crime," amid backlash from Catholic leaders. No confirmed public insults emerged in the last 48 hours, despite ongoing media scrutiny from the White House Correspondents' Dinner incident and Iran tensions, but policy announcements or rally appearances could trigger renewed rhetoric before resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於$852,266 交易量
4月11日
是
4月12日
是
4月13日
是
4月14日
是
4月15日
是
4月16日
是
4月17日
是
4月18日
是
4月19日
否
4月20日
是
4月21日
是
4月22日
是
4月23日
是
4月24日
是
4月25日
是
4月26日
是
4月27日
是
4月28日
否
4月29日
是
4月30日
是
$852,266 交易量
4月11日
是
4月12日
是
4月13日
是
4月14日
是
4月15日
是
4月16日
是
4月17日
是
4月18日
是
4月19日
否
4月20日
是
4月21日
是
4月22日
是
4月23日
是
4月24日
是
4月25日
是
4月26日
是
4月27日
是
4月28日
否
4月29日
是
4月30日
是
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...已提議結果: 是
無爭議
最終結果: 是
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...已提議結果: 是
無爭議
最終結果: 是
President Donald Trump's longstanding pattern of public name-calling via Truth Social and speeches continues to shape trader consensus in this market, with recent examples including his April 22 attack on Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as "low IQ," sharp rebukes of MAGA influencers like Tucker Carlson opposing his Iran policy as "losers" and "stupid," and calls for Jimmy Kimmel's firing over a late-night segment three days ago. These followed his April 12 insults against Pope Leo XIV as "too liberal and weak on crime," amid backlash from Catholic leaders. No confirmed public insults emerged in the last 48 hours, despite ongoing media scrutiny from the White House Correspondents' Dinner incident and Iran tensions, but policy announcements or rally appearances could trigger renewed rhetoric before resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions