Anthropic's Claude models, particularly Opus 4.6 and 4.7 variants, drove the near-certain market outcome through consistent leadership on coding benchmarks such as SWE-bench Verified scores above 80 percent and strong results in agentic workflows during May 2026. These releases, combined with deep integration into developer tools like Cursor and Claude Code, positioned Anthropic as the clear second choice behind OpenAI's GPT-5.5 in real-world multi-file reasoning and large codebase tasks. Trader consensus reflects this edge in demonstrated capabilities over competitors. A last-minute model update or benchmark shift favoring another lab's release could still alter the ranking before end-of-May resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Which company has the second-best Coding AI model end of May?
Anthropic 100.0%
OpenAI <1%
xAI <1%
Baidu <1%
$45,549 交易量
$45,549 交易量

Anthropic
Yes

OpenAI
No

xAI
No

Baidu
No

Amazon
No

Mistral
No

Meituan
No

Microsoft
No

No

Alibaba
No

ByteDance
No

Moonshot
No

Z.ai
No

DeepSeek
No

Meta
No
Anthropic 100.0%
OpenAI <1%
xAI <1%
Baidu <1%
$45,549 交易量
$45,549 交易量

Anthropic
Yes

OpenAI
No

xAI
No

Baidu
No

Amazon
No

Mistral
No

Meituan
No

Microsoft
No

No

Alibaba
No

ByteDance
No

Moonshot
No

Z.ai
No

DeepSeek
No

Meta
No
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
市場開放時間: Apr 27, 2026, 5:49 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...已提議結果: Yes
無爭議
最終結果: Yes
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...已提議結果: Yes
無爭議
最終結果: Yes
Anthropic's Claude models, particularly Opus 4.6 and 4.7 variants, drove the near-certain market outcome through consistent leadership on coding benchmarks such as SWE-bench Verified scores above 80 percent and strong results in agentic workflows during May 2026. These releases, combined with deep integration into developer tools like Cursor and Claude Code, positioned Anthropic as the clear second choice behind OpenAI's GPT-5.5 in real-world multi-file reasoning and large codebase tasks. Trader consensus reflects this edge in demonstrated capabilities over competitors. A last-minute model update or benchmark shift favoring another lab's release could still alter the ranking before end-of-May resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions