Trader consensus assigns claude-opus-4-6-thinking a 100% implied probability of being the top AI model on the LMArena Chatbot Arena Text Overall leaderboard (style control off) as of April 17, 2026, 12:00 PM ET, driven by its dominant Elo score from crowd-sourced battles emphasizing substantive reasoning over stylistic flair in math, coding, and creative tasks. Anthropic's February release of Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking propelled it to #1 with scores like 1502-1546, outpacing rivals through superior long-context handling and instruction-following. Yesterday's Claude Opus 4.7 launch bolsters Anthropic's edge long-term but awaits voter integration on the leaderboard. Realistic challenges include a pre-resolution vote surge for Opus 4.7 or competitors like Gemini 3.1 Pro, though traders see negligible risk given current positioning.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於claude-opus-4-6-thinking 100.0%
claude-opus-4-6 <1%
gemini-3.1-pro-preview <1%
gemini-3-flash <1%
$80,973 交易量
$80,973 交易量
claude-opus-4-6
否
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
否
gemini-3-flash
否
dola-seed-2.0-preview
否
kimi-k2.5-thinking
否
muse-spark
否
claude-opus-4-6-thinking
是
qwen3.5-max-preview
否
gemini-3-pro
否
gemini-2.5-pro
否
grok-4.20-beta1
否
gpt-5.4-high
否
glm-5.1
否
claude-opus-4-6-thinking 100.0%
claude-opus-4-6 <1%
gemini-3.1-pro-preview <1%
gemini-3-flash <1%
$80,973 交易量
$80,973 交易量
claude-opus-4-6
否
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
否
gemini-3-flash
否
dola-seed-2.0-preview
否
kimi-k2.5-thinking
否
muse-spark
否
claude-opus-4-6-thinking
是
qwen3.5-max-preview
否
gemini-3-pro
否
gemini-2.5-pro
否
grok-4.20-beta1
否
gpt-5.4-high
否
glm-5.1
否
Results from the "Score" column under the "Text Arena | Overall" Leaderboard tab at https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked primarily by their arena score at this market’s check time, with alphabetical order of model names as listed in this market group (full string, including suffixes such as “-thinking”) used as a tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by arena score, “claude-opus-4-6” would be ranked ahead of “claude-opus-4-6-thinking”). This market will resolve based on the model that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
市場開放時間: Apr 9, 2026, 5:18 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...已提議結果: 否
無爭議
最終結果: 否
Results from the "Score" column under the "Text Arena | Overall" Leaderboard tab at https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked primarily by their arena score at this market’s check time, with alphabetical order of model names as listed in this market group (full string, including suffixes such as “-thinking”) used as a tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by arena score, “claude-opus-4-6” would be ranked ahead of “claude-opus-4-6-thinking”). This market will resolve based on the model that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...已提議結果: 否
無爭議
最終結果: 否
Trader consensus assigns claude-opus-4-6-thinking a 100% implied probability of being the top AI model on the LMArena Chatbot Arena Text Overall leaderboard (style control off) as of April 17, 2026, 12:00 PM ET, driven by its dominant Elo score from crowd-sourced battles emphasizing substantive reasoning over stylistic flair in math, coding, and creative tasks. Anthropic's February release of Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking propelled it to #1 with scores like 1502-1546, outpacing rivals through superior long-context handling and instruction-following. Yesterday's Claude Opus 4.7 launch bolsters Anthropic's edge long-term but awaits voter integration on the leaderboard. Realistic challenges include a pre-resolution vote surge for Opus 4.7 or competitors like Gemini 3.1 Pro, though traders see negligible risk given current positioning.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions