Anthropic leads trader sentiment at 66.5% implied probability for the top Code Arena WebDev AI model by end of October, driven by its Claude Fable 5.1 Max and Opus 5 variants holding the highest arena.ai leaderboard scores around 1765 through superior performance on agentic frontend coding workflows, multi-step reasoning, and tool-use tasks. Recent September updates to models like Qwen3.8-Max from Alibaba briefly challenged the top spot with preliminary scores but showed overlapping confidence intervals and far fewer votes than Anthropic entries, while Moonshot’s Kimi K3 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 variants trail in the 17% range. Market odds reflect sustained Anthropic dominance on the resolving benchmark amid ongoing releases, though rapid iterations from Chinese labs could still shift positioning before the October 31 resolution.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้วAnthropic 67%
OpenAI 18.1%
Alibaba 5.3%
Z.ai 4.7%
$54,524 ปริมาณ
$54,524 ปริมาณ

Anthropic
67%

OpenAI
18%

Alibaba
5%

Z.ai
5%

Moonshot
3%

SpaceXAI
3%

2%

Tencent
1%

ByteDance
1%

Meta
1%

Mistral
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

MiniMax
<1%

Thinky
<1%
Anthropic 67%
OpenAI 18.1%
Alibaba 5.3%
Z.ai 4.7%
$54,524 ปริมาณ
$54,524 ปริมาณ

Anthropic
67%

OpenAI
18%

Alibaba
5%

Z.ai
5%

Moonshot
3%

SpaceXAI
3%

2%

Tencent
1%

ByteDance
1%

Meta
1%

Mistral
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

MiniMax
<1%

Thinky
<1%
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev (Overall) filtered for "Models" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Aug 12, 2026, 7:56 PM ET
ผู้ตัดสินผล
0x69c47De9D...Results from the "Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev (Overall) filtered for "Models" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
ผู้ตัดสินผล
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic leads trader sentiment at 66.5% implied probability for the top Code Arena WebDev AI model by end of October, driven by its Claude Fable 5.1 Max and Opus 5 variants holding the highest arena.ai leaderboard scores around 1765 through superior performance on agentic frontend coding workflows, multi-step reasoning, and tool-use tasks. Recent September updates to models like Qwen3.8-Max from Alibaba briefly challenged the top spot with preliminary scores but showed overlapping confidence intervals and far fewer votes than Anthropic entries, while Moonshot’s Kimi K3 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 variants trail in the 17% range. Market odds reflect sustained Anthropic dominance on the resolving benchmark amid ongoing releases, though rapid iterations from Chinese labs could still shift positioning before the October 31 resolution.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย