Trader consensus overwhelmingly favors "No" at 97.7% for a new Trump executive order restricting voting methods or eligibility—such as banning mail-in ballots or voting machines—by March 31, reflecting no White House announcements, drafts, or leaks despite earlier 2026 rhetoric on election integrity ahead of the midterms. Recent March executive orders addressed unrelated issues like DEI discrimination and TSA pay, per official records, while pushes for proof-of-citizenship requirements centered on stalled SAVE Act legislation in the Senate rather than unilateral action. Legal precedents show courts swiftly blocking similar past orders on federal overreach into state-run elections, bolstering confidence. A surprise signing in the final hours remains possible but faces steep constitutional barriers.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · ОбновленоДа
NEW
NEW
Mar 31, 2026
Да
NEW
NEW
Mar 31, 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump issues an executive order, proclamation, memorandum, emergency declaration or other formal executive action which seeks to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
Any formal executive action which seeks to achieve one of the listed goals will count, regardless of any legal or implementation challenges it may face after issuance. Mere statements from Donald Trump will not alone qualify; a formal executive action to enact policy must be taken. Executive actions which seek to accomplish a listed goal indirectly (e.g. withholding federal funding from states that do not implement a listed policy) will count, provided a formal executive action to enact policy is taken.
An executive action will be considered to seek to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections if it seeks to do so either nationally or in any limited context (such as in specific states, areas, or election contexts) for use in United States federal elections.
Qualifying examples of potential executive actions include:
- Executive actions seeking to mandate voter ID nationally, in specific areas of the United States, or only in certain contexts.
- Executive actions seeking to ban mail-in voting broadly or in a limited context, including no-excuse mail-in voting, mandatory mail-in voting, or mail-in voting in certain states or areas.
- Executive actions seeking to ban all voting machines or restricting the use of certain classes of voting machines or of voting machines in specific areas.
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official text of the executive action taken; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Trader consensus overwhelmingly favors "No" at 97.7% for a new Trump executive order restricting voting methods or eligibility—such as banning mail-in ballots or voting machines—by March 31, reflecting no White House announcements, drafts, or leaks despite earlier 2026 rhetoric on election integrity ahead of the midterms. Recent March executive orders addressed unrelated issues like DEI discrimination and TSA pay, per official records, while pushes for proof-of-citizenship requirements centered on stalled SAVE Act legislation in the Senate rather than unilateral action. Legal precedents show courts swiftly blocking similar past orders on federal overreach into state-run elections, bolstering confidence. A surprise signing in the final hours remains possible but faces steep constitutional barriers.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump issues an executive order, proclamation, memorandum, emergency declaration or other formal executive action which seeks to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
Any formal executive action which seeks to achieve one of the listed goals will count, regardless of any legal or implementation challenges it may face after issuance. Mere statements from Donald Trump will not alone qualify; a formal executive action to enact policy must be taken. Executive actions which seek to accomplish a listed goal indirectly (e.g. withholding federal funding from states that do not implement a listed policy) will count, provided a formal executive action to enact policy is taken.
An executive action will be considered to seek to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections if it seeks to do so either nationally or in any limited context (such as in specific states, areas, or election contexts) for use in United States federal elections.
Qualifying examples of potential executive actions include:
- Executive actions seeking to mandate voter ID nationally, in specific areas of the United States, or only in certain contexts.
- Executive actions seeking to ban mail-in voting broadly or in a limited context, including no-excuse mail-in voting, mandatory mail-in voting, or mail-in voting in certain states or areas.
- Executive actions seeking to ban all voting machines or restricting the use of certain classes of voting machines or of voting machines in specific areas.
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official text of the executive action taken; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Any formal executive action which seeks to achieve one of the listed goals will count, regardless of any legal or implementation challenges it may face after issuance. Mere statements from Donald Trump will not alone qualify; a formal executive action to enact policy must be taken. Executive actions which seek to accomplish a listed goal indirectly (e.g. withholding federal funding from states that do not implement a listed policy) will count, provided a formal executive action to enact policy is taken.
An executive action will be considered to seek to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections if it seeks to do so either nationally or in any limited context (such as in specific states, areas, or election contexts) for use in United States federal elections.
Qualifying examples of potential executive actions include:
- Executive actions seeking to mandate voter ID nationally, in specific areas of the United States, or only in certain contexts.
- Executive actions seeking to ban mail-in voting broadly or in a limited context, including no-excuse mail-in voting, mandatory mail-in voting, or mail-in voting in certain states or areas.
- Executive actions seeking to ban all voting machines or restricting the use of certain classes of voting machines or of voting machines in specific areas.
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official text of the executive action taken; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Открытие рынка: Feb 26, 2026, 4:08 PM ET
Объем
$704Дата окончания
Mar 31, 2026Открытие рынка
Feb 26, 2026, 4:08 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump issues an executive order, proclamation, memorandum, emergency declaration or other formal executive action which seeks to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
Any formal executive action which seeks to achieve one of the listed goals will count, regardless of any legal or implementation challenges it may face after issuance. Mere statements from Donald Trump will not alone qualify; a formal executive action to enact policy must be taken. Executive actions which seek to accomplish a listed goal indirectly (e.g. withholding federal funding from states that do not implement a listed policy) will count, provided a formal executive action to enact policy is taken.
An executive action will be considered to seek to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections if it seeks to do so either nationally or in any limited context (such as in specific states, areas, or election contexts) for use in United States federal elections.
Qualifying examples of potential executive actions include:
- Executive actions seeking to mandate voter ID nationally, in specific areas of the United States, or only in certain contexts.
- Executive actions seeking to ban mail-in voting broadly or in a limited context, including no-excuse mail-in voting, mandatory mail-in voting, or mail-in voting in certain states or areas.
- Executive actions seeking to ban all voting machines or restricting the use of certain classes of voting machines or of voting machines in specific areas.
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official text of the executive action taken; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Trader consensus overwhelmingly favors "No" at 97.7% for a new Trump executive order restricting voting methods or eligibility—such as banning mail-in ballots or voting machines—by March 31, reflecting no White House announcements, drafts, or leaks despite earlier 2026 rhetoric on election integrity ahead of the midterms. Recent March executive orders addressed unrelated issues like DEI discrimination and TSA pay, per official records, while pushes for proof-of-citizenship requirements centered on stalled SAVE Act legislation in the Senate rather than unilateral action. Legal precedents show courts swiftly blocking similar past orders on federal overreach into state-run elections, bolstering confidence. A surprise signing in the final hours remains possible but faces steep constitutional barriers.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump issues an executive order, proclamation, memorandum, emergency declaration or other formal executive action which seeks to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
Any formal executive action which seeks to achieve one of the listed goals will count, regardless of any legal or implementation challenges it may face after issuance. Mere statements from Donald Trump will not alone qualify; a formal executive action to enact policy must be taken. Executive actions which seek to accomplish a listed goal indirectly (e.g. withholding federal funding from states that do not implement a listed policy) will count, provided a formal executive action to enact policy is taken.
An executive action will be considered to seek to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections if it seeks to do so either nationally or in any limited context (such as in specific states, areas, or election contexts) for use in United States federal elections.
Qualifying examples of potential executive actions include:
- Executive actions seeking to mandate voter ID nationally, in specific areas of the United States, or only in certain contexts.
- Executive actions seeking to ban mail-in voting broadly or in a limited context, including no-excuse mail-in voting, mandatory mail-in voting, or mail-in voting in certain states or areas.
- Executive actions seeking to ban all voting machines or restricting the use of certain classes of voting machines or of voting machines in specific areas.
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official text of the executive action taken; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Any formal executive action which seeks to achieve one of the listed goals will count, regardless of any legal or implementation challenges it may face after issuance. Mere statements from Donald Trump will not alone qualify; a formal executive action to enact policy must be taken. Executive actions which seek to accomplish a listed goal indirectly (e.g. withholding federal funding from states that do not implement a listed policy) will count, provided a formal executive action to enact policy is taken.
An executive action will be considered to seek to mandate voter ID, ban mail-in voting, ban voting machines, or otherwise materially restrict voting methods or eligibility in US federal elections if it seeks to do so either nationally or in any limited context (such as in specific states, areas, or election contexts) for use in United States federal elections.
Qualifying examples of potential executive actions include:
- Executive actions seeking to mandate voter ID nationally, in specific areas of the United States, or only in certain contexts.
- Executive actions seeking to ban mail-in voting broadly or in a limited context, including no-excuse mail-in voting, mandatory mail-in voting, or mail-in voting in certain states or areas.
- Executive actions seeking to ban all voting machines or restricting the use of certain classes of voting machines or of voting machines in specific areas.
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official text of the executive action taken; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Объем
$704Дата окончания
Mar 31, 2026Открытие рынка
Feb 26, 2026, 4:08 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus overwhelmingly favors "No" at 97.7% for a new Trump executive order restricting voting methods or eligibility—such as banning mail-in ballots or voting machines—by March 31, reflecting no White House announcements, drafts, or leaks despite earlier 2026 rhetoric on election integrity ahead of the midterms. Recent March executive orders addressed unrelated issues like DEI discrimination and TSA pay, per official records, while pushes for proof-of-citizenship requirements centered on stalled SAVE Act legislation in the Senate rather than unilateral action. Legal precedents show courts swiftly blocking similar past orders on federal overreach into state-run elections, bolstering confidence. A surprise signing in the final hours remains possible but faces steep constitutional barriers.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket · Обновлено
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы