Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano$1,068,577 Wol.
Aug 1, 2026
August 1
Yes
August 2
No
August 3
Yes
August 4
Yes
August 5
Yes
August 6
Yes
August 7
Yes
August 8
Yes
August 9
Yes
August 10
Yes
August 11
No
August 12
Yes
August 13
Yes
August 14
Yes
August 15
Yes
August 16
Yes
August 17
Yes
August 18
Yes
August 19
Yes
August 20
Yes
August 21
Yes
August 22
Yes
August 23
No
August 24
Yes
August 25
Yes
August 26
Yes
August 27
Yes
August 28
Yes
August 29
Yes
August 30
Yes
August 31
Yes
$1,068,577 Wol.
August 1
$1,460 Wol.
Yes
August 2
$3,874 Wol.
No
August 3
$2,055 Wol.
Yes
August 4
$3,612 Wol.
Yes
August 5
$5,490 Wol.
Yes
August 6
$2,384 Wol.
Yes
August 7
$2,710 Wol.
Yes
August 8
$3,278 Wol.
Yes
August 9
$1,906 Wol.
Yes
August 10
$1,595 Wol.
Yes
August 11
$10,863 Wol.
No
August 12
$4,011 Wol.
Yes
August 13
$87,209 Wol.
Yes
August 14
$3,173 Wol.
Yes
August 15
$6,650 Wol.
Yes
August 16
$2,155 Wol.
Yes
August 17
$6,918 Wol.
Yes
August 18
$6,535 Wol.
Yes
August 19
$5,160 Wol.
Yes
August 20
$3,184 Wol.
Yes
August 21
$3,130 Wol.
Yes
August 22
$7,075 Wol.
Yes
August 23
$826,048 Wol.
No
August 24
$5,562 Wol.
Yes
August 25
$8,578 Wol.
Yes
August 26
$8,064 Wol.
Yes
August 27
$8,531 Wol.
Yes
August 28
$10,404 Wol.
Yes
August 29
$13,881 Wol.
Yes
August 30
$6,082 Wol.
Yes
August 31
$7,002 Wol.
Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Rynek otwarty: Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ET
Wolumen
$1,068,577Data zakończenia
Sep 1, 2026Rynek otwarty
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...Wynik zaproponowany: Yes
Brak sporu
Ostateczny wynik: Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Wolumen
$1,068,577Data zakończenia
Sep 1, 2026Rynek otwarty
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...Wynik zaproponowany: Yes
Brak sporu
Ostateczny wynik: Yes
Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania