This is a market on if MetaMask will have a live token by December 31st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET. 

Having a live token in this context can be defined as a deployed-to-mainnet, actively transferrable and/or tradable token that is in some way native to the MetaMask product or protocol, and substantiated by MetaMask or ConsenSys via official websites or social media channels. Empirically speaking, having a live token will be considered fulfilled if official project channels announce the introduction of the token and it is live on mainnet, and swappable and acquirable (i.e. via Uniswap). In the case of a token being announced but not yet transferrable or “live”, that will not satisfy market conditions. If the token is deployed to mainnet (in any form, including some sort of voucher), but is not transferrable, that will also not satisfy market conditions. In the case of ERC20 tokens, if the token is deployed, but there is no existing Uniswap pool for the token, it will be considered not “live” and thus will not satisfy market conditions. 

For clarity, this market is about fungible tokens, and not NFTs related to a platform.


If MetaMask has a live token by December 31st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Yes". If not, the market will resolve to "No". 

By December 31st?

This is a group market on if MetaMask will launch a token by a variety of different dates.

This is a market on if MetaMask will have a live token by February 1st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET. Having a live token in this context can be defined as a deployed-to-mainnet, actively transferrable and/or tradable token that is in some way native to the MetaMask product or protocol, and substantiated by MetaMask or ConsenSys via official websites or social media channels. Empirically speaking, having a live token will be considered fulfilled if official project channels announce the introduction of the token and it is live on mainnet, and swappable and acquirable (i.e. via Uniswap). In the case of a token being announced but not yet transferrable or “live”, that will not satisfy market conditions. If the token is deployed to mainnet (in any form, including some sort of voucher), but is not transferrable, that will also not satisfy market conditions. In the case of ERC20 tokens, if the token is deployed, but there is no existing Uniswap pool for the token, it will be considered not “live” and thus will not satisfy market conditions. For clarity, this market is about fungible tokens, and not NFTs related to a platform.

If MetaMask has a live token by February 1st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Yes". If not, the market will resolve to "No". 

By February 1st?

This is a market on if MetaMask will have a live token by March 1st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET. Having a live token in this context can be defined as a deployed-to-mainnet, actively transferrable and/or tradable token that is in some way native to the MetaMask product or protocol, and substantiated by MetaMask or ConsenSys via official websites or social media channels. Empirically speaking, having a live token will be considered fulfilled if official project channels announce the introduction of the token and it is live on mainnet, and swappable and acquirable (i.e. via Uniswap). In the case of a token being announced but not yet transferrable or “live”, that will not satisfy market conditions. If the token is deployed to mainnet (in any form, including some sort of voucher), but is not transferrable, that will also not satisfy market conditions. In the case of ERC20 tokens, if the token is deployed, but there is no existing Uniswap pool for the token, it will be considered not “live” and thus will not satisfy market conditions. For clarity, this market is about fungible tokens, and not NFTs related to a platform.

If MetaMask has a live token by March 1st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Yes". If not, the market will resolve to "No". 

By March 1st?

This is a market on if MetaMask will have a live token by June 1st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET. Having a live token in this context can be defined as a deployed-to-mainnet, actively transferrable and/or tradable token that is in some way native to the MetaMask product or protocol, and substantiated by MetaMask or ConsenSys via official websites or social media channels. Empirically speaking, having a live token will be considered fulfilled if official project channels announce the introduction of the token and it is live on mainnet, and swappable and acquirable (i.e. via Uniswap). In the case of a token being announced but not yet transferrable or “live”, that will not satisfy market conditions. If the token is deployed to mainnet (in any form, including some sort of voucher), but is not transferrable, that will also not satisfy market conditions. In the case of ERC20 tokens, if the token is deployed, but there is no existing Uniswap pool for the token, it will be considered not “live” and thus will not satisfy market conditions. For clarity, this market is about fungible tokens, and not NFTs related to a platform.

If MetaMask has a live token by June 1st, 2022, 11:59:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Yes". If not, the market will resolve to "No". 

Will MetaMask launch a token by December 31st, 2022?

About this market