Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$1,068,577 Vol.
2026/08/01
8月1日
はい
8月2日
いいえ
8月3日
はい
8月4日
はい
8月5日
はい
8月6日
はい
8月7日
はい
8月8日
はい
8月9日
はい
8月10日
はい
8月11日
いいえ
8月12日
はい
8月13日
はい
8月14日
はい
8月15日
はい
8月16日
はい
8月17日
はい
8月18日
はい
8月19日
はい
8月20日
はい
8月21日
はい
8月22日
はい
8月23日
いいえ
8月24日
はい
8月25日
はい
8月26日
はい
8月27日
はい
8月28日
はい
8月29日
はい
8月30日
はい
8月31日
はい
$1,068,577 Vol.
8月1日
$1,460 Vol.
はい
8月2日
$3,874 Vol.
いいえ
8月3日
$2,055 Vol.
はい
8月4日
$3,612 Vol.
はい
8月5日
$5,490 Vol.
はい
8月6日
$2,384 Vol.
はい
8月7日
$2,710 Vol.
はい
8月8日
$3,278 Vol.
はい
8月9日
$1,906 Vol.
はい
8月10日
$1,595 Vol.
はい
8月11日
$10,863 Vol.
いいえ
8月12日
$4,011 Vol.
はい
8月13日
$87,209 Vol.
はい
8月14日
$3,173 Vol.
はい
8月15日
$6,650 Vol.
はい
8月16日
$2,155 Vol.
はい
8月17日
$6,918 Vol.
はい
8月18日
$6,535 Vol.
はい
8月19日
$5,160 Vol.
はい
8月20日
$3,184 Vol.
はい
8月21日
$3,130 Vol.
はい
8月22日
$7,075 Vol.
はい
8月23日
$826,048 Vol.
いいえ
8月24日
$5,562 Vol.
はい
8月25日
$8,578 Vol.
はい
8月26日
$8,064 Vol.
はい
8月27日
$8,531 Vol.
はい
8月28日
$10,404 Vol.
はい
8月29日
$13,881 Vol.
はい
8月30日
$6,082 Vol.
はい
8月31日
$7,002 Vol.
はい
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ET
音量
$1,068,577終了日
2026/09/01マーケット開始日
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...提案された結果: はい
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: はい
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$1,068,577終了日
2026/09/01マーケット開始日
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...提案された結果: はい
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: はい
Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問