Trump's second-term communication style features a documented rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric compared to his first term, as shown in analyses of speeches and social media posts. Recent examples include labeling a reporter a "dumb person" during questions on White House projects, introducing the term "Dumocrats" for political opponents, and directing remarks at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias. These incidents align with his established approach of direct public criticism during press interactions, Truth Social activity, and public events. Traders monitoring daily or date-specific resolution markets assess ongoing patterns in his unscripted remarks and social media output, with scheduled appearances or breaking developments potentially influencing the frequency of such statements through June.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$1,358,217 Vol.
2026/05/31
May 1
Yes
May 2
Yes
May 3
Yes
May 4
Yes
May 5
Yes
May 6
Yes
May 7
Yes
May 8
Yes
May 9
Yes
May 10
Yes
May 11
Yes
May 12
Yes
May 13
Yes
May 14
Yes
May 15
Yes
May 16
Yes
May 17
Yes
May 18
Yes
May 19
Yes
May 20
Yes
May 21
Yes
May 22
Yes
May 23
Yes
May 24
Yes
May 25
Yes
May 26
Yes
May 27
Yes
May 28
Yes
May 29
Yes
May 30
Yes
May 31
Yes
$1,358,217 Vol.
May 1
$22,471 Vol.
Yes
May 2
$7,897 Vol.
Yes
May 3
$10,878 Vol.
Yes
May 4
$16,665 Vol.
Yes
May 5
$19,051 Vol.
Yes
May 6
$70,171 Vol.
Yes
May 7
$89,915 Vol.
Yes
May 8
$35,461 Vol.
Yes
May 9
$16,549 Vol.
Yes
May 10
$13,086 Vol.
Yes
May 11
$25,918 Vol.
Yes
May 12
$20,739 Vol.
Yes
May 13
$22,542 Vol.
Yes
May 14
$63,157 Vol.
Yes
May 15
$18,250 Vol.
Yes
May 16
$9,763 Vol.
Yes
May 17
$28,657 Vol.
Yes
May 18
$21,764 Vol.
Yes
May 19
$11,500 Vol.
Yes
May 20
$19,136 Vol.
Yes
May 21
$27,971 Vol.
Yes
May 22
$22,094 Vol.
Yes
May 23
$12,875 Vol.
Yes
May 24
$30,410 Vol.
Yes
May 25
$13,982 Vol.
Yes
May 26
$16,333 Vol.
Yes
May 27
$18,414 Vol.
Yes
May 28
$479,905 Vol.
Yes
May 29
$19,978 Vol.
Yes
May 30
$22,717 Vol.
Yes
May 31
$149,969 Vol.
Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's second-term communication style features a documented rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric compared to his first term, as shown in analyses of speeches and social media posts. Recent examples include labeling a reporter a "dumb person" during questions on White House projects, introducing the term "Dumocrats" for political opponents, and directing remarks at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias. These incidents align with his established approach of direct public criticism during press interactions, Truth Social activity, and public events. Traders monitoring daily or date-specific resolution markets assess ongoing patterns in his unscripted remarks and social media output, with scheduled appearances or breaking developments potentially influencing the frequency of such statements through June.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
音量
$1,358,217終了日
2026/05/31マーケット開始日
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...提案された結果: Yes
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's second-term communication style features a documented rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric compared to his first term, as shown in analyses of speeches and social media posts. Recent examples include labeling a reporter a "dumb person" during questions on White House projects, introducing the term "Dumocrats" for political opponents, and directing remarks at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias. These incidents align with his established approach of direct public criticism during press interactions, Truth Social activity, and public events. Traders monitoring daily or date-specific resolution markets assess ongoing patterns in his unscripted remarks and social media output, with scheduled appearances or breaking developments potentially influencing the frequency of such statements through June.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$1,358,217終了日
2026/05/31マーケット開始日
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...提案された結果: Yes
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: Yes
Trump's second-term communication style features a documented rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric compared to his first term, as shown in analyses of speeches and social media posts. Recent examples include labeling a reporter a "dumb person" during questions on White House projects, introducing the term "Dumocrats" for political opponents, and directing remarks at journalists such as Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias. These incidents align with his established approach of direct public criticism during press interactions, Truth Social activity, and public events. Traders monitoring daily or date-specific resolution markets assess ongoing patterns in his unscripted remarks and social media output, with scheduled appearances or breaking developments potentially influencing the frequency of such statements through June.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問