Intense competition among frontier AI labs keeps implied probabilities tightly clustered near 50% across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and numerous Chinese and other players for the top Code Arena WebDev model by end of July. Recent releases such as Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 have posted leading SWE-bench scores above 88% through strong agentic coding and long-running repository edits, while OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 series matches or exceeds them on verified tasks and tool use. Google Gemini variants excel at multimodal UI generation and large-context reasoning. Frequent benchmark updates, rapid iteration cycles, and specialization in web-specific workflows like frontend frameworks, API integration, and autonomous debugging create ongoing volatility, with no model yet demonstrating consistent dominance across all WebDev criteria.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日Anthropic 100.0%
Google 1.8%
OpenAI <1%
Z.ai <1%
$78,506 Vol.
$78,506 Vol.

OpenAI
いいえ

Anthropic
はい

Z.ai
いいえ

SpaceXAI
いいえ

Meta
いいえ

ByteDance
いいえ

アリババ
いいえ

ムーンショット
いいえ

いいえ

MiniMax
いいえ

シャオミ
いいえ

DeepSeek
いいえ

テンセント
いいえ

Poolside
いいえ

Mistral
いいえ
Anthropic 100.0%
Google 1.8%
OpenAI <1%
Z.ai <1%
$78,506 Vol.
$78,506 Vol.

OpenAI
いいえ

Anthropic
はい

Z.ai
いいえ

SpaceXAI
いいえ

Meta
いいえ

ByteDance
いいえ

アリババ
いいえ

ムーンショット
いいえ

いいえ

MiniMax
いいえ

シャオミ
いいえ

DeepSeek
いいえ

テンセント
いいえ

Poolside
いいえ

Mistral
いいえ
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev (Overall) filtered for "Models" will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard found at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
マーケット開始日: Jul 15, 2026, 9:39 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...提案された結果: いいえ
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: いいえ
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev (Overall) filtered for "Models" will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard found at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...提案された結果: いいえ
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: いいえ
Intense competition among frontier AI labs keeps implied probabilities tightly clustered near 50% across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and numerous Chinese and other players for the top Code Arena WebDev model by end of July. Recent releases such as Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 have posted leading SWE-bench scores above 88% through strong agentic coding and long-running repository edits, while OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 series matches or exceeds them on verified tasks and tool use. Google Gemini variants excel at multimodal UI generation and large-context reasoning. Frequent benchmark updates, rapid iteration cycles, and specialization in web-specific workflows like frontend frameworks, API integration, and autonomous debugging create ongoing volatility, with no model yet demonstrating consistent dominance across all WebDev criteria.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日


外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問