Recent model releases have tightened the race for third place on Arena.ai’s Code Arena WebDev leaderboard, where crowdsourced Elo ratings evaluate agentic frontend coding performance across real-world tasks. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 currently occupy the top two spots following early September launches, leaving Moonshot’s Kimi K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max variants clustered just behind with strong cost-performance and multi-step reasoning scores. Chinese labs benefit from rapid iteration cycles and favorable token pricing, while Meta, xAI, and Z.ai models show competitive but slightly lower community vote momentum. Traders price high uncertainty into third place because leaderboard swings depend on ongoing votes and any late-October updates before resolution.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourMoonshot 38%
Alibaba 33%
OpenAI 6.3%
SpaceXAI 5.5%
$36,452 Vol.
$36,452 Vol.
31 oct. 2026
Moonshot
38%
Alibaba
33%
OpenAI
6%
SpaceXAI
5%
Anthropic
5%
3%
Meta
3%
Z.ai
2%
Mistral
2%
Thinky
1%
DeepSeek
1%
Tencent
1%
ByteDance
1%
MiniMax
<1%
Xiaomi
<1%
Poolside
<1%
Moonshot 38%
Alibaba 33%
OpenAI 6.3%
SpaceXAI 5.5%
$36,452 Vol.
$36,452 Vol.
31 oct. 2026
Moonshot
$10,967 Vol.
38%
Alibaba
$17,438 Vol.
33%
OpenAI
$884 Vol.
6%
SpaceXAI
$659 Vol.
5%
Anthropic
$604 Vol.
5%
$482 Vol.
3%
Meta
$496 Vol.
3%
Z.ai
$656 Vol.
2%
Mistral
$581 Vol.
2%
Thinky
$586 Vol.
1%
DeepSeek
$580 Vol.
1%
Tencent
$539 Vol.
1%
ByteDance
$613 Vol.
1%
MiniMax
$573 Vol.
<1%
Xiaomi
$302 Vol.
<1%
Poolside
$492 Vol.
<1%
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on October 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Recent model releases have tightened the race for third place on Arena.ai’s Code Arena WebDev leaderboard, where crowdsourced Elo ratings evaluate agentic frontend coding performance across real-world tasks. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 currently occupy the top two spots following early September launches, leaving Moonshot’s Kimi K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max variants clustered just behind with strong cost-performance and multi-step reasoning scores. Chinese labs benefit from rapid iteration cycles and favorable token pricing, while Meta, xAI, and Z.ai models show competitive but slightly lower community vote momentum. Traders price high uncertainty into third place because leaderboard swings depend on ongoing votes and any late-October updates before resolution.
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on October 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Marché ouvert : Aug 12, 2026, 8:01 PM ET
Volume
$36,452Date de fin
1 nov. 2026Marché ouvert
Aug 12, 2026, 8:01 PM ETRésolveur
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on October 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Recent model releases have tightened the race for third place on Arena.ai’s Code Arena WebDev leaderboard, where crowdsourced Elo ratings evaluate agentic frontend coding performance across real-world tasks. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 currently occupy the top two spots following early September launches, leaving Moonshot’s Kimi K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max variants clustered just behind with strong cost-performance and multi-step reasoning scores. Chinese labs benefit from rapid iteration cycles and favorable token pricing, while Meta, xAI, and Z.ai models show competitive but slightly lower community vote momentum. Traders price high uncertainty into third place because leaderboard swings depend on ongoing votes and any late-October updates before resolution.
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on October 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Volume
$36,452Date de fin
1 nov. 2026Marché ouvert
Aug 12, 2026, 8:01 PM ETRésolveur
0x69c47De9D...Recent model releases have tightened the race for third place on Arena.ai’s Code Arena WebDev leaderboard, where crowdsourced Elo ratings evaluate agentic frontend coding performance across real-world tasks. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 currently occupy the top two spots following early September launches, leaving Moonshot’s Kimi K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max variants clustered just behind with strong cost-performance and multi-step reasoning scores. Chinese labs benefit from rapid iteration cycles and favorable token pricing, while Meta, xAI, and Z.ai models show competitive but slightly lower community vote momentum. Traders price high uncertainty into third place because leaderboard swings depend on ongoing votes and any late-October updates before resolution.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes