Trader consensus in the Worst Cup match prices Infamous FC at near-certain implied probability due to the event's novelty format featuring football lookalikes, where roster composition and stylistic matchups heavily favor one side. Recent pre-match developments, including lineup announcements and the six-vs-six rules without offside, have reinforced this positioning through visible team strengths and historical patterns in similar exhibition games. While the high probability reflects skin-in-the-game agreement among traders, realistic factors that could still shift the outcome include unexpected injuries to key impersonators, referee decisions on the unique pitch setup, or sudden form reversals common in low-stakes contests.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedWorst Cup: Fakers FC vs. Infamous FC
Worst Cup: Fakers FC vs. Infamous FC
Fakers
$95,886 Vol.
$95,886 Vol.
Jun 10, 2026
Fakers
$95,886 Vol.
$95,886 Vol.
Jun 10, 2026
If Fakers FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Fakers”. If Infamous FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Infamous”.
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, within two weeks of the scheduled date, or no winner is declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any extra time or penalty shootouts.Trader consensus in the Worst Cup match prices Infamous FC at near-certain implied probability due to the event's novelty format featuring football lookalikes, where roster composition and stylistic matchups heavily favor one side. Recent pre-match developments, including lineup announcements and the six-vs-six rules without offside, have reinforced this positioning through visible team strengths and historical patterns in similar exhibition games. While the high probability reflects skin-in-the-game agreement among traders, realistic factors that could still shift the outcome include unexpected injuries to key impersonators, referee decisions on the unique pitch setup, or sudden form reversals common in low-stakes contests.
If Fakers FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Fakers”. If Infamous FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Infamous”.
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, within two weeks of the scheduled date, or no winner is declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any extra time or penalty shootouts.
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, within two weeks of the scheduled date, or no winner is declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any extra time or penalty shootouts.
Market Opened: Jun 5, 2026, 9:40 AM ET
Volume
$95,886End Date
Jun 10, 2026Market Opened
Jun 5, 2026, 9:40 AM ETResolution Source
https://kick.com/polymarketResolver
0x65070BE91...Outcome proposed: Infamous
No dispute
Final outcome: Infamous
If Fakers FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Fakers”. If Infamous FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Infamous”.
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, within two weeks of the scheduled date, or no winner is declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any extra time or penalty shootouts.Trader consensus in the Worst Cup match prices Infamous FC at near-certain implied probability due to the event's novelty format featuring football lookalikes, where roster composition and stylistic matchups heavily favor one side. Recent pre-match developments, including lineup announcements and the six-vs-six rules without offside, have reinforced this positioning through visible team strengths and historical patterns in similar exhibition games. While the high probability reflects skin-in-the-game agreement among traders, realistic factors that could still shift the outcome include unexpected injuries to key impersonators, referee decisions on the unique pitch setup, or sudden form reversals common in low-stakes contests.
If Fakers FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Fakers”. If Infamous FC wins the Worst Cup match scheduled for June 9, 2026, this market will resolve to “Infamous”.
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, within two weeks of the scheduled date, or no winner is declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any extra time or penalty shootouts.
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, within two weeks of the scheduled date, or no winner is declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any extra time or penalty shootouts.
Volume
$95,886End Date
Jun 10, 2026Market Opened
Jun 5, 2026, 9:40 AM ETResolution Source
https://kick.com/polymarketResolver
0x65070BE91...Outcome proposed: Infamous
No dispute
Final outcome: Infamous
Trader consensus in the Worst Cup match prices Infamous FC at near-certain implied probability due to the event's novelty format featuring football lookalikes, where roster composition and stylistic matchups heavily favor one side. Recent pre-match developments, including lineup announcements and the six-vs-six rules without offside, have reinforced this positioning through visible team strengths and historical patterns in similar exhibition games. While the high probability reflects skin-in-the-game agreement among traders, realistic factors that could still shift the outcome include unexpected injuries to key impersonators, referee decisions on the unique pitch setup, or sudden form reversals common in low-stakes contests.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions