Voter sentiment on Colorado's Initiative 109 reflects a tight balance between widespread public support for designating school and college sports teams by biological sex and organized opposition in a state with Democratic-leaning voters. The measure, which requires teams to be classified as male, female, or co-ed based on reproductive biology and bars transgender girls from female teams, qualified for the November 2026 ballot after proponents gathered over 168,000 signatures in early 2026. Proponents highlight fairness and safety concerns in female athletics, while groups such as One Colorado and Hands Off Colorado are mobilizing against it on inclusion grounds. Parallel legislative action, including HB26-1083 on protecting female sports, and similar ballot measures in other states add context, with the closely divided odds indicating that campaign spending, turnout among parents and LGBTQ+ communities, and late-cycle messaging on youth participation rules could shift the outcome.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedThis market will resolve to “Yes” if this ballot measure is approved as a result of the Colorado statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
Subsequent litigation or any failure to implement the measure will have no impact on the resolution of this market.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of Colorado, including the Colorado Secretary of State (https://www.sos.state.co.us/).
Market Opened: Jul 10, 2026, 6:29 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if this ballot measure is approved as a result of the Colorado statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
Subsequent litigation or any failure to implement the measure will have no impact on the resolution of this market.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of Colorado, including the Colorado Secretary of State (https://www.sos.state.co.us/).
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Voter sentiment on Colorado's Initiative 109 reflects a tight balance between widespread public support for designating school and college sports teams by biological sex and organized opposition in a state with Democratic-leaning voters. The measure, which requires teams to be classified as male, female, or co-ed based on reproductive biology and bars transgender girls from female teams, qualified for the November 2026 ballot after proponents gathered over 168,000 signatures in early 2026. Proponents highlight fairness and safety concerns in female athletics, while groups such as One Colorado and Hands Off Colorado are mobilizing against it on inclusion grounds. Parallel legislative action, including HB26-1083 on protecting female sports, and similar ballot measures in other states add context, with the closely divided odds indicating that campaign spending, turnout among parents and LGBTQ+ communities, and late-cycle messaging on youth participation rules could shift the outcome.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated

Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions