Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert$1,068,577 Vol.
1. Aug. 2026
1. August
Ja
2. August
Nein
3. August
Ja
4. August
Ja
5. August
Ja
6. August
Ja
7. August
Ja
8. August
Ja
9. August
Ja
10. August
Ja
11. August
Nein
12. August
Ja
13. August
Ja
14. August
Ja
15. August
Ja
16. August
Ja
17. August
Ja
18. August
Ja
19. August
Ja
20. August
Ja
21. August
Ja
22. August
Ja
23. August
Nein
24. August
Ja
25. August
Ja
26. August
Ja
27. August
Ja
28. August
Ja
29. August
Ja
30. August
Ja
31. August
Ja
$1,068,577 Vol.
1. August
$1,460 Vol.
Ja
2. August
$3,874 Vol.
Nein
3. August
$2,055 Vol.
Ja
4. August
$3,612 Vol.
Ja
5. August
$5,490 Vol.
Ja
6. August
$2,384 Vol.
Ja
7. August
$2,710 Vol.
Ja
8. August
$3,278 Vol.
Ja
9. August
$1,906 Vol.
Ja
10. August
$1,595 Vol.
Ja
11. August
$10,863 Vol.
Nein
12. August
$4,011 Vol.
Ja
13. August
$87,209 Vol.
Ja
14. August
$3,173 Vol.
Ja
15. August
$6,650 Vol.
Ja
16. August
$2,155 Vol.
Ja
17. August
$6,918 Vol.
Ja
18. August
$6,535 Vol.
Ja
19. August
$5,160 Vol.
Ja
20. August
$3,184 Vol.
Ja
21. August
$3,130 Vol.
Ja
22. August
$7,075 Vol.
Ja
23. August
$826,048 Vol.
Nein
24. August
$5,562 Vol.
Ja
25. August
$8,578 Vol.
Ja
26. August
$8,064 Vol.
Ja
27. August
$8,531 Vol.
Ja
28. August
$10,404 Vol.
Ja
29. August
$13,881 Vol.
Ja
30. August
$6,082 Vol.
Ja
31. August
$7,002 Vol.
Ja
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Markt eröffnet: Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ET
Volumen
$1,068,577Enddatum
1. Sep. 2026Markt eröffnet
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ETAbwickler
0x65070BE91...Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Ja
Kein Einspruch
Endgültiges Ergebnis: Ja
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$1,068,577Enddatum
1. Sep. 2026Markt eröffnet
Jul 27, 2026, 11:18 PM ETAbwickler
0x65070BE91...Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Ja
Kein Einspruch
Endgültiges Ergebnis: Ja
Trump’s long-standing pattern of issuing direct personal criticisms through social media posts, press interactions, and public remarks drives high trader consensus on markets tracking daily insults. As president in 2026, he has continued this approach amid foreign policy tensions, including recent statements on Iran and trade disputes with figures such as Canadian and UK leaders. Resolution criteria focus strictly on verifiable public statements using derogatory language, nicknames, or attacks on an individual’s competence or character, excluding pure policy disagreements. Markets for prior 2026 dates resolved Yes at near-certain levels based on similar activity, with volume reflecting skin-in-the-game assessments of his communication style. Any scheduled appearances, Truth Social activity, or media exchanges on August 31 could trigger resolution.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen